State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Alaska

903 CFPB complaints filed against 300 debt collectors active in Alaska.

Complaints
903
Collectors
300
Per 100k
123

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Alaska Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws — contact the Alaska Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Alaska

Consumers in Alaska have filed 903 CFPB debt collection complaints against 300 different collectors — a rate of 123.1 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Alaska and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Alaska is Cornerstone Holdings, Inc., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Alaska-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors — Page 4

Sorted by most complaints

Prince Parker & Associates

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

ATG Credit, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Rausch Sturm LLP

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Bonneville Billing and Collections

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Credit Card Receivables Fund Incorporated

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Riverwalk Financial Corporation

F
4 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

SIMM Associates, Inc.

D
4 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

SLM CORPORATION

C
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

P&B Capital Group, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

AmerAssist A/R Solutions, Inc.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

The Phoenix Recovery Group

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Patient Accounting Service Center

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Direct Recovery Services, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

FREEDOM FINANCIAL NETWORK

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Delbert Services

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Herbert P. Sears Co., Inc.

C
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

U.S. Collections West, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Lloyd & McDaniel, PLC

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Account Control Technology, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Alliant Capital Management LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Global Credit & Collection Corporation

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

COAST PROFESSIONAL, INC.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Torriere Holdings INC

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Phillips & Cohen Associates, Ltd.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Express Recovery Services, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Seattle Service Bureau, Inc

D
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Concord Servicing Corporation

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Professional Credit Management, Inc

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Sequoia Financial Services

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Valor Intelligent Processing, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Media Collections, Inc

C
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Nelson Cruz & Associates LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Remex, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

M&T BANK CORPORATION

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Tate and Kirlin Assoc

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK, THE

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Windham Professionals, Inc.

D
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Credit Bureau Collection Services, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

KEYCORP

D
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Key 2 Recovery, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Suttell, Hammer & White, P.S

D
6 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

P.S.C., Inc

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Aspen National Financial, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

FIRST PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Altisource Portfolio Solutions, S.à r.l.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Mobiloans, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Atlantic Credit & Finance, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Allied International Credit Corp., (US)

C
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Consumer Financial Services Solutions, Inc.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Alaska appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Alaska residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Alaska Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Alaska attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Alaska). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Alaska-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Alaska reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Alaska's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.