State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Missouri

16,438 CFPB complaints filed against 1,173 debt collectors active in Missouri.

Complaints
16,438
Collectors
1,173
Top collector
Equifax, Inc.

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Missouri at a glance

Missouri consumers have filed 16,438 CFPB debt-collection complaints against 1,173 collectors.

16,438
CFPB complaints filed
1,173
collectors active here
#1
most-complained: Equifax, Inc.

State-of-residence is the consumer's address at filing, not the collector's. A complaint is a consumer filing, not a proven violation.

Insights: Debt Collection in Missouri

Consumers in Missouri have filed 16,438 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,173 different collectors. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Missouri and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

A per-capita complaint rate is a filing rate, not a measure of misconduct or of a state's legal protections. It can be affected by population estimates, awareness of the CFPB complaint channel, the mix of creditors and collectors, and other factors that this dataset does not measure.

The collector with the most complaints from Missouri residents in this dataset is Equifax, Inc.. Use the record as one input when researching a company; it does not establish a legal violation or answer a state-law question.

Active Debt Collectors - Page 11

Sorted by most complaints

Huntington Debt Holding LLC

D
3 total complaints → stable

Insta-Credit Auto Mart, Inc. dba InstaCredit Automart

B
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Integrity Solution Services, Inc.

C
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Io, Inc.

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

JPL Recovery Solutions

F
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Jon Barry and Associates, Inc.

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

LendUp Loans LLC

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Lionstone Holdings Group

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Louisiana Recovery Services Inc.

C
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Master Finance Company

B
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Merchants' Credit Guide Company

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Meridian ARG Inc.

F
3 total complaints ↓ falling

MoneyLion Inc.

F
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Morgan & Associates, P.C.

B
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Nationwide Acceptance LLC

C
3 total complaints → stable

NPAS, Inc.

F
3 total complaints → stable

National Commercial Services, Inc

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

National Principal Group, LLC

C
3 total complaints ↓ falling

North Shore Agency, LLC

C
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Optima Recovery Services LLC.

C
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Prestige Financial Services Inc

C
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Patenaude & Felix A Professional Corporation

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Perfection Collection

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Platinum Holdings Group, LLC

F
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Professional Receivables Network

C
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Rfna, LP

C
3 total complaints ↑ rising

RN Financial, LLC

A
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Rauch-Milliken International, Inc.

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Recovery One, LLC

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Reel Time Capital LLC

D
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Riverwalk Financial Corporation

F
3 total complaints ↓ falling

SG and Associates

F
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Second Round Limited Partnership, Austin, TX Branch

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Sentry Recovery and Collections, Inc.

D
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Skopos Financial, LLC

B
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Stellantis Financial Services US Corp.

D
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Summit A*R, Inc.

D
3 total complaints ↑ rising

TMX Finance LLC

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Tribal Lending Enterprise, Inc.

C
3 total complaints ↓ falling

UMB Financial Corporation

B
3 total complaints ↑ rising

USCB Corporation

D
3 total complaints ↑ rising

VW Credit

C
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Vengroff Williams, Inc

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

WLCC

C
3 total complaints → stable

Westcreek Financial

F
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Wharthog Ventures LLC dba Loans Not Sharks

F
3 total complaints → stable

2233 Paradise Road LLC

D
2 total complaints ↑ rising

A.R.M. Solutions, Inc.

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

ACQ Holdings, LLC.

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

ADP Inc.

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

If a collector is contacting you in Missouri

Start with the federal complaint record, then verify any state-law question with an official source.

  • Check the collector's national record and grade before you respond or pay. Browse rankings
  • Demand written debt validation within 30 days of first contact. Validation letter
  • Use the CFPB complaint process and check official Missouri resources for state-specific options. Your rights

Per-capita rate reflects consumer filings, not collector misconduct or a legal conclusion. This is not legal advice.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Missouri appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Missouri residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against company activity (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), consumer-dispute rate (the share of company responses consumers flagged as inadequate), and complaint trend (whether recent volume is rising, stable, or falling). The composite is bucketed A through F on a curve, each grade holds roughly a fifth of the 5,283 graded collectors, so an F reflects the weakest ~20% relative to peers, not an absolute threshold. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Missouri Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint - the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Missouri attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Missouri). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Missouri-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Missouri reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies, a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Missouri's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector, they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.