State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Maryland

25,302 CFPB complaints filed against 1,273 debt collectors active in Maryland.

Complaints
25,302
Collectors
1,273
Top collector
Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Maryland at a glance

Maryland consumers have filed 25,302 CFPB debt-collection complaints against 1,273 collectors.

25,302
CFPB complaints filed
1,273
collectors active here
#1
most-complained: Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

State-of-residence is the consumer's address at filing, not the collector's. A complaint is a consumer filing, not a proven violation.

Insights: Debt Collection in Maryland

Consumers in Maryland have filed 25,302 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,273 different collectors. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Maryland and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

A per-capita complaint rate is a filing rate, not a measure of misconduct or of a state's legal protections. It can be affected by population estimates, awareness of the CFPB complaint channel, the mix of creditors and collectors, and other factors that this dataset does not measure.

The collector with the most complaints from Maryland residents in this dataset is Resurgent Capital Services L.P.. Use the record as one input when researching a company; it does not establish a legal violation or answer a state-law question.

Active Debt Collectors - Page 15

Sorted by most complaints

Law Offices of Robert J. Colclough, III

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Legal Prevention Services, LLC.

B
2 total complaints ↓ falling

LendingUSA

B
2 total complaints → stable

Loan Science, LLC

B
2 total complaints ↓ falling

M. G. Credit, Inc.

D
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Midcountry Financial Corp

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Mvba, L.L.C.

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Malcolm S. Gerald and Associates, Inc.

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

McMichael Taylor Gray LLC

B
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Merchants Credit Bureau, Inc.

D
2 total complaints → stable

Mercury Financial Intermediate LLC

D
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Millco Management

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Ncsplus Incorporated

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

National Check Resolution Inc.

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

National Financial LLC

B
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Nations Recovery Center

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Northeast Collection Bureau

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

ONE WAY Recovery Solutions, LLC

A
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Onemain Finance Corporation

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

OUT Tech, Inc.

C
2 total complaints → stable

Omnipoint Capital

F
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Pmab,LLC

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Palmar, Inc.

F
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Partners Financial Services Inc

B
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Patenaude & Felix A Professional Corporation

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Payment Resolution Services

C
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Premier Account Management

B
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Premier Portfolio Group

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Professional Medical Management, Inc.

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Professional Receivables Network

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Regions Financial Corporation

D
2 total complaints ↑ rising

RGS Financial, Inc.

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Razor Capital, LLC

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Receivables Management Corporation

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Recovery Management Solutions LLC

F
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Recuvery LLC

D
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Reel Time Capital LLC

D
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Rent Recover, LLC

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Residential Credit Solutions, Inc.

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Results Unlimited, Inc.

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Revenue Recovery Corporation

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Rhojo Enterprises, LLC

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Rock Creek Capital, LLC

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Rocket Mortgage, LLC

C
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Round Two Recovery

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Rushmore Service Center, LLC

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Russell W Richardson, Attorney at Law

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

S&N Debt Solutions, LLC

B
2 total complaints ↓ falling

SUN West Mortgage Company, Inc.

D
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Sa-Vit Enterprises, Inc.

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

If a collector is contacting you in Maryland

Start with the federal complaint record, then verify any state-law question with an official source.

  • Check the collector's national record and grade before you respond or pay. Browse rankings
  • Demand written debt validation within 30 days of first contact. Validation letter
  • Use the CFPB complaint process and check official Maryland resources for state-specific options. Your rights

Per-capita rate reflects consumer filings, not collector misconduct or a legal conclusion. This is not legal advice.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, more than 1,139,000 debt collection complaints have been logged nationwide as of July 2026. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Maryland appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Maryland residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against company activity (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), consumer-dispute rate (the share of company responses consumers flagged as inadequate), and complaint trend (whether recent volume is rising, stable, or falling). The composite is bucketed A through F on a curve, each grade holds roughly a fifth of the 5,283 graded collectors, so an F reflects the weakest ~20% relative to peers, not an absolute threshold. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Maryland Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint - the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Maryland attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Maryland). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Maryland-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Maryland reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies, a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Maryland's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector, they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.