State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Maryland

23,511 CFPB complaints filed against 1,257 debt collectors active in Maryland.

Complaints
23,511
Collectors
1,257
Per 100k
380

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Maryland Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws — contact the Maryland Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Maryland

Consumers in Maryland have filed 23,511 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,257 different collectors — a rate of 380.4 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Maryland and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Maryland is EQUIFAX, INC., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Maryland-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Most-complained-about collectors in Maryland

By complaints filed from this state

complaints

What this shows These eight collectors draw the most complaints from Maryland residents — usually national bureaus and large debt buyers operating in every state.

Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Active Debt Collectors

Sorted by most complaints

TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.

D
1,043 total complaints 468 last 12mo ↑ rising

EQUIFAX, INC.

D
1,085 total complaints 554 last 12mo ↑ rising

Experian Information Solutions Inc.

D
949 total complaints 407 last 12mo → stable

ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP INC.

D
1,009 total complaints 296 last 12mo ↑ rising

Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

D
1,080 total complaints 423 last 12mo ↑ rising

Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

D
989 total complaints 293 last 12mo ↑ rising

CL Holdings LLC

D
651 total complaints 286 last 12mo ↑ rising

CCS Financial Services, Inc.

F
435 total complaints 166 last 12mo ↑ rising

I.C. System, Inc.

D
259 total complaints 56 last 12mo ↑ rising

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

D
420 total complaints 104 last 12mo ↑ rising

TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS INC

D
716 total complaints 132 last 12mo ↑ rising

National Credit Systems,Inc.

D
277 total complaints 113 last 12mo ↑ rising

SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL

D
259 total complaints 31 last 12mo ↑ rising

Kriya Capital, LLC

D
165 total complaints 70 last 12mo ↑ rising

CITIBANK, N.A.

D
252 total complaints 51 last 12mo ↑ rising

ERC

D
231 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc.

D
176 total complaints 39 last 12mo ↑ rising

CAINE & WEINER COMPANY, INC.

D
182 total complaints 72 last 12mo ↑ rising

Convergent Resources, Inc.

D
169 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.

D
156 total complaints 35 last 12mo ↑ rising

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY

D
158 total complaints 30 last 12mo ↑ rising

BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

D
192 total complaints 36 last 12mo ↑ rising

National Credit Adjusters, LLC

D
67 total complaints 8 last 12mo ↑ rising

HW Holding, Inc

D
222 total complaints 54 last 12mo ↑ rising

Southwest Credit Systems, L.P.

D
347 total complaints 72 last 12mo ↑ rising

Spring Oaks Capital, LLC

F
104 total complaints 54 last 12mo ↑ rising

Radius Global Solutions LLC

D
138 total complaints 43 last 12mo ↑ rising

Rowland Avenue Management, Inc. A/KA Columbia Debt Recovery, LLC d/b/a Genesis

F
134 total complaints 44 last 12mo ↑ rising

DISCOVER BANK

D
128 total complaints 39 last 12mo ↑ rising

T.S. Holdings

F
66 total complaints 21 last 12mo ↑ rising

SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC

D
148 total complaints 52 last 12mo ↑ rising

AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY

D
77 total complaints 22 last 12mo ↑ rising

Diversified Consultants, Inc.

D
100 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

CAVALRY INVESTMENTS, LLC

D
99 total complaints 22 last 12mo ↑ rising

ProCollect, Inc.

F
35 total complaints 8 last 12mo ↑ rising

FAIR COLLECTIONS & OUTSOURCING, INC.

D
381 total complaints 118 last 12mo ↑ rising

AFNI INC.

D
65 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

NCB Management Services Inc.

D
83 total complaints 17 last 12mo ↑ rising

Amsher Collection Services, Inc.

D
79 total complaints 18 last 12mo → stable

Navient Solutions, LLC.

D
99 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION

D
222 total complaints 68 last 12mo ↑ rising

Aldous & Associates, PLLC

D
44 total complaints 22 last 12mo ↑ rising

Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc.

F
97 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Harris & Harris, Ltd.

D
134 total complaints 42 last 12mo ↑ rising

The CBE Group, Inc.

D
48 total complaints 5 last 12mo ↑ rising

Affirm Holdings, Inc

F
103 total complaints 55 last 12mo ↑ rising

TrueAccord Corp.

D
66 total complaints 30 last 12mo ↑ rising

Sequium Asset Solutions, LLC

F
72 total complaints 17 last 12mo ↑ rising

HCFS Healthcare Financial Services of TeamHealth

F
24 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

W&A Intermediate Co., LLC

F
23 total complaints 5 last 12mo ↑ rising

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Maryland appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Maryland residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Maryland Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Maryland attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Maryland). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Maryland-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Maryland reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Maryland's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.