State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Maryland

25,302 CFPB complaints filed against 1,273 debt collectors active in Maryland.

Complaints
25,302
Collectors
1,273
Top collector
Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Maryland at a glance

Maryland consumers have filed 25,302 CFPB debt-collection complaints against 1,273 collectors.

25,302
CFPB complaints filed
1,273
collectors active here
#1
most-complained: Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

State-of-residence is the consumer's address at filing, not the collector's. A complaint is a consumer filing, not a proven violation.

Maryland Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws, contact the Maryland Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Maryland

Consumers in Maryland have filed 25,302 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,273 different collectors. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Maryland and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself, not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Maryland is Resurgent Capital Services L.P., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Maryland-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA, licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds, see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Most-complained-about collectors in Maryland

By complaints filed from this state

complaints

What this shows These eight collectors draw the most complaints from Maryland residents, usually national bureaus and large debt buyers operating in every state.

Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Active Debt Collectors

Sorted by most complaints

Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

D
1,196 total complaints ↑ rising

Encore Capital Group Inc.

D
1,130 total complaints ↑ rising

Equifax, Inc.

D
1,114 total complaints ↑ rising

Transunion Intermediate Holdings, Inc.

D
1,099 total complaints ↑ rising

Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

D
1,091 total complaints ↑ rising

Experian Information Solutions Inc.

D
1,023 total complaints ↑ rising

CL Holdings LLC

D
790 total complaints ↑ rising

Transworld Systems Inc

D
757 total complaints → stable

CCS Financial Services, Inc.

F
478 total complaints ↑ rising

Capital ONE Financial Corporation

D
448 total complaints → stable

Fair Collections & Outsourcing, Inc.

D
416 total complaints ↑ rising

Southwest Credit Systems, L.P.

D
363 total complaints → stable

National Credit Systems,Inc.

D
324 total complaints ↑ rising

I.C. System, Inc.

D
300 total complaints ↑ rising

Synchrony Financial

D
273 total complaints → stable

Citibank, N.a.

D
265 total complaints → stable

HW Holding, Inc

D
242 total complaints → stable

Navy Federal Credit Union

D
242 total complaints ↑ rising

ERC

D
231 total complaints ↓ falling

Caine & Weiner Company, Inc.

D
219 total complaints ↑ rising

Bank of America, National Association

D
211 total complaints → stable

Kriya Capital, LLC

D
203 total complaints ↑ rising

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc.

D
187 total complaints ↑ rising

American Collections Enterprise, Inc.

D
182 total complaints ↓ falling

Wells Fargo & Company

D
170 total complaints ↑ rising

Convergent Resources, Inc.

D
169 total complaints ↓ falling

Io, Inc.

D
168 total complaints ↓ falling

Jpmorgan Chase & Co.

D
164 total complaints ↑ rising

Sunrise Credit Services, Inc

D
158 total complaints ↑ rising

Radius Global Solutions LLC

D
156 total complaints ↑ rising

NRA Group, LLC

D
152 total complaints ↑ rising

Harris & Harris, Ltd.

D
146 total complaints ↑ rising

Rowland Avenue Management, Inc. A/KA Columbia Debt Recovery, LLC d/b/a Genesis

F
146 total complaints ↑ rising

Financial Management Solutions, LLC

D
140 total complaints ↓ falling

LJ Ross Associates

D
138 total complaints ↑ rising

Discover Bank

D
124 total complaints ↓ falling

Affirm Holdings, Inc

F
121 total complaints ↑ rising

Spring Oaks Capital, LLC

F
121 total complaints ↑ rising

EOS Holdings, Inc.

D
109 total complaints ↓ falling

Aargon Agency, Inc.

F
103 total complaints → stable

Cavalry Investments, LLC

D
103 total complaints → stable

Navient Solutions, LLC.

D
101 total complaints ↓ falling

Diversified Consultants, Inc.

D
100 total complaints ↓ falling

Klima, Peters & Daly, P.A.

D
100 total complaints → stable

First Advantage LNS Inc.

F
98 total complaints ↓ falling

Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc.

F
97 total complaints ↓ falling

Credit Acceptance Corporation

D
95 total complaints ↑ rising

NCB Management Services Inc.

D
93 total complaints ↑ rising

American Express Company

D
92 total complaints ↑ rising

TD Bank US Holding Company

D
80 total complaints ↑ rising

If a collector is contacting you in Maryland

Federal FDCPA rights apply everywhere; some state protections go further.

  • Check the collector's national record and grade before you respond or pay. Browse rankings
  • Demand written debt validation within 30 days of first contact. Validation letter
  • File with the CFPB, your Maryland attorney general, or the state finance regulator, the three channels run in parallel. Your rights

Per-capita rate reflects where consumers file, not collector misconduct. Not legal advice, for your situation, consult a licensed attorney.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Maryland appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Maryland residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against company activity (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), consumer-dispute rate (the share of company responses consumers flagged as inadequate), and complaint trend (whether recent volume is rising, stable, or falling). The composite is bucketed A through F on a curve, each grade holds roughly a fifth of the 5,283 graded collectors, so an F reflects the weakest ~20% relative to peers, not an absolute threshold. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Maryland Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint - the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Maryland attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Maryland). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Maryland-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Maryland reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies, a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Maryland's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector, they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.