State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Ohio

30,195 CFPB complaints filed against 1,483 debt collectors active in Ohio.

Complaints
30,195
Collectors
1,483
Top collector
Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Ohio at a glance

Ohio consumers have filed 30,195 CFPB debt-collection complaints against 1,483 collectors.

30,195
CFPB complaints filed
1,483
collectors active here
#1
most-complained: Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

State-of-residence is the consumer's address at filing, not the collector's. A complaint is a consumer filing, not a proven violation.

Insights: Debt Collection in Ohio

Consumers in Ohio have filed 30,195 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,483 different collectors. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Ohio and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

A per-capita complaint rate is a filing rate, not a measure of misconduct or of a state's legal protections. It can be affected by population estimates, awareness of the CFPB complaint channel, the mix of creditors and collectors, and other factors that this dataset does not measure.

The collector with the most complaints from Ohio residents in this dataset is Resurgent Capital Services L.P.. Use the record as one input when researching a company; it does not establish a legal violation or answer a state-law question.

Active Debt Collectors - Page 17

Sorted by most complaints

Brennan & Clark, Ltd., LLC

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Brian McCaffrey, Attorney At Law

F
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Bridge IT, Inc.

D
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Brightwater Capital, LLC

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

CCB Credit Serivces, Inc

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

CDI Affiliated Services, Inc.

D
2 total complaints ↑ rising

CHECKredi of Kentucky, LLC

D
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Cherry Technologies Inc.

F
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Corelogic Inc

C
2 total complaints → stable

Credit Bureau of NEW ULM, Inc.

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

CW Financial

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Caddis Funding, LLC

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Capital Asset Recovery INC DBA Jacobson and Wright

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Cars America Inc.

F
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Carvana Group, LLC

D
2 total complaints → stable

Centron Services

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Chainlink Services LLC

C
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Citi Management Group, LLC

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Climb Credit Inc.

D
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Coast 2 Coast Financial Group, LLC

C
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Coastal Financial Solutions, LLC

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Cohen Kaplan Tulowitz LLC

B
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Collection Management Services, Inc.

D
2 total complaints → stable

Collection Services, Inc.

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Columbus Finance Inc.

A
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Commercial Trade, Inc.

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Commonwealth Health Corporation

B
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Community Loan Servicing, LLC (formerly known as Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC)

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Compass Recovery Group, LLC

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Computer Credit, Inc.

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Consolidated Management Group, LLC

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Convergence Acquisitions, LLC

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Cooper Hoffman Klein Associates

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Cordoza & Wexler Recovery Services

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Credit Collections U.S.A., L.L.C.

F
2 total complaints → stable

Creditors Bureau Associates

D
2 total complaints → stable

Douglas, Knight & Associates, Inc.

B
2 total complaints ↓ falling

DRS Financial LLC

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

DSR Holdings Group, LLC

F
2 total complaints → stable

DataMax Corporation

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Debt Collectors International, Inc.

F
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Debt Management Partners LLC

B
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Debt Solutions LLC

F
2 total complaints → stable

Deca Financial Services LLC (Closed)

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Delivery Financial Services, LLC

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Delray Capital, LLC

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Delta Outsource Group, Inc.

B
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc.

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Direct Capital

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

If a collector is contacting you in Ohio

Start with the federal complaint record, then verify any state-law question with an official source.

  • Check the collector's national record and grade before you respond or pay. Browse rankings
  • Demand written debt validation within 30 days of first contact. Validation letter
  • Use the CFPB complaint process and check official Ohio resources for state-specific options. Your rights

Per-capita rate reflects consumer filings, not collector misconduct or a legal conclusion. This is not legal advice.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, more than 1,139,000 debt collection complaints have been logged nationwide as of July 2026. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Ohio appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Ohio residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against company activity (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), consumer-dispute rate (the share of company responses consumers flagged as inadequate), and complaint trend (whether recent volume is rising, stable, or falling). The composite is bucketed A through F on a curve, each grade holds roughly a fifth of the 5,283 graded collectors, so an F reflects the weakest ~20% relative to peers, not an absolute threshold. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Ohio Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint - the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Ohio attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Ohio). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Ohio-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Ohio reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies, a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Ohio's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector, they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.