State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Ohio

30,195 CFPB complaints filed against 1,483 debt collectors active in Ohio.

Complaints
30,195
Collectors
1,483
Top collector
Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Ohio at a glance

Ohio consumers have filed 30,195 CFPB debt-collection complaints against 1,483 collectors.

30,195
CFPB complaints filed
1,483
collectors active here
#1
most-complained: Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

State-of-residence is the consumer's address at filing, not the collector's. A complaint is a consumer filing, not a proven violation.

Insights: Debt Collection in Ohio

Consumers in Ohio have filed 30,195 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,483 different collectors. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Ohio and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

A per-capita complaint rate is a filing rate, not a measure of misconduct or of a state's legal protections. It can be affected by population estimates, awareness of the CFPB complaint channel, the mix of creditors and collectors, and other factors that this dataset does not measure.

The collector with the most complaints from Ohio residents in this dataset is Resurgent Capital Services L.P.. Use the record as one input when researching a company; it does not establish a legal violation or answer a state-law question.

Active Debt Collectors - Page 18

Sorted by most complaints

Evergreen Professional Recoveries, Inc.

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Ezcorp, Inc.

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Early Warning Services, LLC

B
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Earm LLC

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Eastern Asset Services LLC

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Eaton Group Attorneys LLC

D
2 total complaints → stable

Element Global Services

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Elite Portfolio Management, LLC

B
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Emerald Canyon Capital, LLC

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Encircle Collections, Inc.

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Estate Information Services, LLC

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

FEDChex Recovery, LLC

F
2 total complaints ↑ rising

First Citizens Bancshares, Inc.

B
2 total complaints → stable

Fric Holding Corporation

B
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Federated Capital Corporation

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Fenton & McGarvey Law Firm, P.S.C.

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Figure Technologies, Inc

C
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Financial Data Systems

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Financial Solution Providers LLC

B
2 total complaints ↓ falling

First Associates Loan Servicing LLC

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

First Financial Resources, Inc.

C
2 total complaints → stable

Franklin Credit Management Corporation

B
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Frederick J. Hanna & Associates, P.C. (closed)

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Freedom Mortgage Company

C
2 total complaints → stable

Friendly Finance Corporation

B
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Full Circle Financial Services, LLC

B
2 total complaints ↓ falling

George Gusses Co., L.P.A.

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Global Asset Management Group, Inc.

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Global Consulting Agency LLC

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Global Control, Inc.

A
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Global Payments Check Services, Inc.

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Global Portfolio Recovery, LLC

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Goal Structured Solutions, LLC

F
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Grace Recovery Services, Inc.

A
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Grain Technology, Inc.

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

GreenSky, LLC

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Greenback Recovery Group, LLC

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

H. Kent Hollins, Attorney at Law, P.A

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

HF Holdings

D
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Halstatt Search Partners

A
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Harpeth Financial Services, LLC

C
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Hidden Oak Group, Inc.

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Hollis Cobb Associates

D
2 total complaints → stable

Huntington Debt Holding LLC

D
2 total complaints → stable

Ideal Collection Services, Inc.

F
2 total complaints → stable

Joseph R. Harrison Co. LPA

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Jonathan C. Frank & Associates, LLC

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Jzanus Ltd.

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

KLS Financial Services, Inc

F
2 total complaints → stable

If a collector is contacting you in Ohio

Start with the federal complaint record, then verify any state-law question with an official source.

  • Check the collector's national record and grade before you respond or pay. Browse rankings
  • Demand written debt validation within 30 days of first contact. Validation letter
  • Use the CFPB complaint process and check official Ohio resources for state-specific options. Your rights

Per-capita rate reflects consumer filings, not collector misconduct or a legal conclusion. This is not legal advice.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, more than 1,139,000 debt collection complaints have been logged nationwide as of July 2026. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Ohio appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Ohio residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against company activity (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), consumer-dispute rate (the share of company responses consumers flagged as inadequate), and complaint trend (whether recent volume is rising, stable, or falling). The composite is bucketed A through F on a curve, each grade holds roughly a fifth of the 5,283 graded collectors, so an F reflects the weakest ~20% relative to peers, not an absolute threshold. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Ohio Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint - the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Ohio attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Ohio). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Ohio-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Ohio reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies, a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Ohio's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector, they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.