State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Illinois

38,476 CFPB complaints filed against 1,530 debt collectors active in Illinois.

Complaints
38,476
Collectors
1,530
Per 100k
307

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Illinois Debt Collection Laws

Illinois Collection Agency Act requires debt collectors to be licensed and bonded. Check license status with the Illinois Department of Financial & Professional Regulation.

Contact your state attorney general for current enforcement information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Illinois

Consumers in Illinois have filed 38,476 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,530 different collectors — a rate of 306.6 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Illinois and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Illinois is TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Illinois-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors — Page 8

Sorted by most complaints

COAST PROFESSIONAL, INC.

D
13 total complaints 3 last 12mo → stable

REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION

D
12 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

Torriere Holdings INC

D
7 total complaints 5 last 12mo ↑ rising

BMW Financial Services NA, LLC

D
10 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

D&A Services, LLC

D
13 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

Phillips & Cohen Associates, Ltd.

D
16 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Sentry Recovery and Collections, Inc.

D
4 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

Stenger & Stenger, P.C

D
4 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

Cascade Capital, LLC

D
4 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Omega RMS, LLC

D
14 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

Seattle Service Bureau, Inc

D
29 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

Mercedes Benz Financial Services

D
3 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Pendrick Capital Partners Holding, LLC

C
9 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Nationwide Capital Services, LLC

F
11 total complaints 8 last 12mo ↑ rising

Ideal Collection Services, Inc.

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Concord Servicing Corporation

C
9 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

OLIPHANT FINANCIAL, LLC

D
12 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Professional Credit Management, Inc

D
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Lending Club Corp

D
18 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Leafy Financial, LLC

F
5 total complaints 5 last 12mo ↑ rising

PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC.

D
22 total complaints 8 last 12mo ↑ rising

SG and Associates

F
7 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Sequoia Financial Services

C
5 total complaints 2 last 12mo → stable

Grant Mercantile Agency

D
14 total complaints 4 last 12mo ↑ rising

Webcollex, LLC

D
11 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Collection Information Bureau, Inc.

D
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Valor Intelligent Processing, LLC

F
21 total complaints 11 last 12mo ↑ rising

Perfection Collection

D
15 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Media Collections, Inc

C
14 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

Professional Bureau of Collections of Maryland, Inc., GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO Branch

D
10 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Nelson Cruz & Associates LLC

F
4 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Persolve, LLC - Legal - Series 2

F
11 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

FMA Alliance, Ltd.

C
9 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

CAC Financial Corp

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

International Computer Systems, Inc.

D
10 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

N.A.R., Inc.

D
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Complete Credit Solutions, Inc.

D
6 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↓ falling

Remex, Inc.

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Paramount GR Holdings, LLC

F
6 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

M&T BANK CORPORATION

C
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Byrider Franchising, LLC

D
30 total complaints 8 last 12mo ↑ rising

Commercial Acceptance Company

D
3 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Tate and Kirlin Assoc

D
9 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

Sezzle Inc.

F
10 total complaints 4 last 12mo ↑ rising

HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK, THE

C
21 total complaints 9 last 12mo ↑ rising

Kingston Data & Credit International Inc.

F
15 total complaints 5 last 12mo ↑ rising

American Accounts & Advisers, Inc.

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Mountain Run Solutions, LLC

F
12 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

NATIONAL DEBT RELIEF LLC

F
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Windham Professionals, Inc.

D
10 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Illinois appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Illinois residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Illinois Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Illinois attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Illinois). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Illinois-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Illinois reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Illinois's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.