State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Oregon

6,420 CFPB complaints filed against 865 debt collectors active in Oregon.

Complaints
6,420
Collectors
865
Per 100k
152

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Oregon Debt Collection Laws

Oregon requires debt collectors to be licensed. The Oregon Unlawful Debt Collection Practices Act provides additional remedies.

Licensing Required

Contact your state attorney general for current enforcement information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Oregon

Consumers in Oregon have filed 6,420 CFPB debt collection complaints against 865 different collectors — a rate of 151.7 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Oregon and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Oregon is Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Oregon-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors — Page 14

Sorted by most complaints

Emergent Business Group, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

C & M Associates Group, Inc.

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Estate Information Services, LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Peterson Enterprises, Inc.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANCORP INC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Tribal Lending Enterprise, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Kehoe Financial Group, LLC

B
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Clearview Resolution Services

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Google Compare Credit Cards Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Bursey & Associates, P.C.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Guidiville Indian Rancheria

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

American Credit Resolution, Incorporated

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Greeting Team, LLC DBA Customer Care Global

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

World Recovery Service, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Credit Glory LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Kashia Services

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Valley Credit Service, Inc. (OR)

F
30 total complaints 4 last 12mo ↑ rising

Alliance Group & Associates LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Law Office of J.A. Cambece

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

United Shore Financial Services, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Olympic Collection Inc.

D
4 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

Cascade Collections, Inc.

F
13 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↓ falling

Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Western Portfolio Assets

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Dynamic Collectors, Incorporated

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Accounts Receivable Inc.

B
5 total complaints 2 last 12mo → stable

Weinman Acquisition Group

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

E. A. Uffman & Associates, Inc

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Esser, James & Associates

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Streamline Recovery Inc

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Essential Retrieval Group

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

CHS, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Western Mercantile Agency, Inc

C
30 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↓ falling

Account Recovery Services, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

MEDCAH, Inc.

D
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↓ falling

Columbia Collectors Inc

F
7 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

RevNow LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

INTEGRAL RECOVERIES, INC.

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Scott Lowery Law Office, P.C.

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Fairway Collections, LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Caneel Capital, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Bryant, Hodge & Associates LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Accounts Receivable Consultants Inc.

C
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Reliant Financial Corporation

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Legal Prevention Services, LLC.

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Rocky Mountain Capital Management

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Wolf River Development Company

C
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Reliance Exchange Group

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Home Loan Center, Inc.

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Protocol Recovery Service, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Oregon appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Oregon residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Oregon Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Oregon attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Oregon). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Oregon-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Oregon reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Oregon's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.