State complaint profile
Debt collection complaints in Oregon
6,420 CFPB complaints filed against 865 debt collectors active in Oregon.
- Complaints
- 6,420
- Collectors
- 865
- Per 100k
- 152
This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.
Oregon Debt Collection Laws
Oregon requires debt collectors to be licensed. The Oregon Unlawful Debt Collection Practices Act provides additional remedies.
Contact your state attorney general for current enforcement information.
Insights: Debt Collection in Oregon
Consumers in Oregon have filed 6,420 CFPB debt collection complaints against 865 different collectors — a rate of 151.7 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Oregon and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.
Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.
The most-complained-about collector active in Oregon is Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Oregon-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.
Active Debt Collectors — Page 15
Sorted by most complaintsQuest Legal Group
FLocal Data Recovery, LLC
FJ&L Collection Services
BRichard J. Boudreau & Associates, LLC
FACCELERATED COLLECTION SERVICE, INC
FHealth Services Asset Management, LLC.
CDream Center Education Holdings
BWest Bay Acquisitions, LLC
BCredits, Incorporated
FElite Recovery Group LLC
CMcCarthy & Holthus, LLP
CAdvanced Call Center Technologies, LLC
BImperial Recovery Consultants, LLC
FBrinkman Alliance Group
FACCESS GROUP INC.
BTotal Customer Service, Inc.
BCreditors Specialty Service Inc
FCollection Center Inc
DRossi Law Offices, Ltd
CPLS GROUP, INC
BManhattan Beach Venture, LLC
FSpringer Collections Inc.
DGiggle Finance Inc.
FUMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION
BDOUGLAS, KNIGHT & ASSOCIATES, INC.
BP&L Acquisitions LLC
CSouthwest Mediation Service
DPARSON BISHOP SERVICES, INC
CCOLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM, INC.
CUtah System of Higher Education
BStein Law, P.C.
CPacific Collections
FTrademark Management Solutions, LLC.
CCW Financial
FLoan South Finance & Tax Service of Troy, LLC
CLPH, Inc.
CConsumer Recovery Solutions, LLC
FDebt Management Partners LLC
BVinci Law Office, LLC
BAsset Collections Inc
CMetro Area Collection Service, Inc.
BRNN Group, Inc
DPortland Credit Inc
DMatthew Thomas & Associates LLC
FMichael Haynes & Associates, LLC
CWorldwide Recovery LLC
FBenjamin Chaise & Associates
CAssigned Credit Solutions
DAccounts Receivable Services
CBlackrock Mitigation Group LLC
FRead our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
About These Collectors
Every collector listed for Oregon appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Oregon residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.
What the Grade Means
Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.
Filing a Complaint as a Oregon Resident
If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Oregon attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Oregon). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.
Methodology Note
State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.
Reading This Page Alongside the National View
Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Oregon-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Oregon reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.
What the Per-Capita Rate Means
The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Oregon's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.
| Publisher | Kiznis Studio |
| Sources | the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database |