State complaint profile
Debt collection complaints in Kentucky
7,180 CFPB complaints filed against 861 debt collectors active in Kentucky.
- Complaints
- 7,180
- Collectors
- 861
- Top collector
- GLA Collection Company, Inc.
This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.
Kentucky at a glance
Kentucky consumers have filed 7,180 CFPB debt-collection complaints against 861 collectors.
- 7,180
- CFPB complaints filed
- 861
- collectors active here
- #1
- most-complained: GLA Collection Company, Inc.
State-of-residence is the consumer's address at filing, not the collector's. A complaint is a consumer filing, not a proven violation.
Kentucky Debt Collection Laws
Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws, contact the Kentucky Attorney General for state-specific information.
Insights: Debt Collection in Kentucky
Consumers in Kentucky have filed 7,180 CFPB debt collection complaints against 861 different collectors. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Kentucky and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.
Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself, not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.
The most-complained-about collector active in Kentucky is GLA Collection Company, Inc., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Kentucky-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA, licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds, see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.
Active Debt Collectors - Page 7
Sorted by most complaintsCommercial Recovery Systems
FConcord Servicing Corporation
CConsumer Collection Management. Inc
FDSR Holdings Group, LLC
FData and Contact Management Solutions, LLC
CEastern Account Systems of Connecticut, Inc.
DEverest Receivable Services Inc.
CF.H. Cann & Associates, Inc.
DFC HoldCo LLC
DFMA Alliance, Ltd.
CFinancial Recovery Services, Inc.
DGreat Lakes
CGulf Coast Collection Bureau, Inc.
DGalaxy Capital Acquisitions, LLC
DGlobal Lending Services LLC
DHovg, LLC
FInDebted Corporation
FJim Bottin Enterprises, Inc
DJon Barry and Associates, Inc.
DKeith D. Weiner & Associates Co., L.P.A.
CKentucky Higher Education Assistance Authority
CKlarna AB
FL.B.Gray LLC A Debt Collection Agency
BM&T Bank Corporation
CManley Deas & Kochalski LLC
CMaury Cobb, Attorney at Law, LLC
CMedical & Professional Collection Services, Inc. NC.
CMeridian Financial Services, Inc.
DMichael G. Niles
BMoneyLion Inc.
FNational Recovery Solutions, LLC
COptio Solutions, LLC
DOxford Law, LLC
CParamount GR Holdings, LLC
FPrince Parker & Associates
DProfessional Debt Mediation, Inc.
FProfessional Finance Company, Inc.
DProsper Marketplace, Inc.
CRMS-Recovery Management Services, Inc.
CRS Clark and Associates, Inc.
FRecovery Management Solutions LLC
FRevenue Assistance Corporation dba Revenue Group
DRozlin Financial Group, Inc.
DSCA Collections, Inc.
DSquaretwo Financial Corporation
DSeattle Service Bureau, Inc
DShepherd Outsourcing, LLC
FSinglePoint GI
FTerrill Outsourcing Group
CTexas Guaranteed
CIf a collector is contacting you in Kentucky
Federal FDCPA rights apply everywhere; some state protections go further.
- Check the collector's national record and grade before you respond or pay. Browse rankings
- Demand written debt validation within 30 days of first contact. Validation letter
- File with the CFPB, your Kentucky attorney general, or the state finance regulator, the three channels run in parallel. Your rights
Per-capita rate reflects where consumers file, not collector misconduct. Not legal advice, for your situation, consult a licensed attorney.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
About These Collectors
Every collector listed for Kentucky appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Kentucky residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.
What the Grade Means
Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against company activity (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), consumer-dispute rate (the share of company responses consumers flagged as inadequate), and complaint trend (whether recent volume is rising, stable, or falling). The composite is bucketed A through F on a curve, each grade holds roughly a fifth of the 5,283 graded collectors, so an F reflects the weakest ~20% relative to peers, not an absolute threshold. Click any company to see the breakdown.
Filing a Complaint as a Kentucky Resident
If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint - the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Kentucky attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Kentucky). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.
Methodology Note
State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.
Reading This Page Alongside the National View
Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Kentucky-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Kentucky reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies, a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.
What the Per-Capita Rate Means
The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Kentucky's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector, they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.
Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.
| Publisher | PlainCollector |
| Sources | the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database |