State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Tennessee

20,434 CFPB complaints filed against 1,258 debt collectors active in Tennessee.

Complaints
20,434
Collectors
1,258
Per 100k
287

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Tennessee Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws — contact the Tennessee Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Tennessee

Consumers in Tennessee have filed 20,434 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,258 different collectors — a rate of 286.7 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Tennessee and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Tennessee is TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Tennessee-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors — Page 5

Sorted by most complaints

ECMC GROUP, INC.

D
36 total complaints 4 last 12mo ↑ rising

HOVG, LLC

F
13 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

AMCOL Systems, Inc.

D
9 total complaints 4 last 12mo ↑ rising

Harvard Collections, LLC

D
14 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

Financial Credit Service, Inc.

D
7 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Professional Finance Company, Inc.

D
5 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

MOHELA

F
7 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

Southern Management Systems Inc.

F
7 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Synovus Bank

C
11 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↓ falling

Millco Management

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Northstar Location Services, LLC

D
10 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE COMPANY LLC

D
10 total complaints 5 last 12mo ↑ rising

FIFTH THIRD FINANCIAL CORPORATION

D
20 total complaints 4 last 12mo ↑ rising

Revco Management, LLC

F
14 total complaints 4 last 12mo ↑ rising

Capital Management Services, LP

D
7 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Synerprise Consulting Services, Inc.

D
4 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Merchants' Credit Guide Company

D
5 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

AVANTE

D
22 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

KBR INC DBA RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES

F
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Diverse Funding Associates LLC

D
4 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

Reliant Capital Solutions, LLC

D
18 total complaints 4 last 12mo ↑ rising

MERCANTILE ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, LLC

D
5 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.

D
6 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Optimum Outcomes, Inc.

F
6 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Possible Financial Inc

F
8 total complaints 4 last 12mo ↑ rising

Regional Management Corporation

D
18 total complaints 7 last 12mo ↑ rising

Asset Management Outsourcing, Inc.

D
16 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

SECURITY FINANCE CORP

D
35 total complaints 7 last 12mo ↑ rising

ONEMAIN FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, LLC.

D
13 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

FISERV FINXACT CORE

F
20 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

ResidentCollect, Inc.

F
6 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Ray Klein, Inc.

D
6 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

COMMUNITY CHOICE FINANCIAL, INC.

D
31 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Crown Asset Management, LLC, Duluth, GA Branch

D
7 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Optio Solutions, LLC

D
10 total complaints 8 last 12mo ↑ rising

Strategic Alliances, Inc.

D
16 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Blitt and Gaines, P.C.

D
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo → stable

Performant Financial Corporation

D
20 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Collection Bureau of the Hudson Valley, Inc.

D
6 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Real Time Group, Inc.

D
13 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

SCA Collections, Inc.

D
21 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Monarch Recovery Holdings, Inc.

D
12 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

RS Clark and Associates, Inc.

F
10 total complaints 4 last 12mo ↑ rising

Law Office of Michael J. Scott, PC

D
12 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

January Technologies, Inc

F
14 total complaints 6 last 12mo ↑ rising

Focus Holding Company

D
18 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Nationwide Recovery Systems, Ltd

D
17 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Global Lending Services LLC

D
9 total complaints 5 last 12mo ↑ rising

Associated Credit Services, Inc.

D
6 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Maximus Federal Services, Inc.

F
3 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Tennessee appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Tennessee residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Tennessee Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Tennessee attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Tennessee). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Tennessee-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Tennessee reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Tennessee's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.