State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Kentucky

6,847 CFPB complaints filed against 856 debt collectors active in Kentucky.

Complaints
6,847
Collectors
856
Per 100k
151

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Kentucky Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws — contact the Kentucky Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Kentucky

Consumers in Kentucky have filed 6,847 CFPB debt collection complaints against 856 different collectors — a rate of 151.3 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Kentucky and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Kentucky is GLA Collection Company, Inc., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Kentucky-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors — Page 10

Sorted by most complaints

Oliver Adjustment Co.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

SECURITY CREDIT SYSTEMS INC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Fay Servicing, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

RAS LaVrar, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Coast to Coast Financial Solutions, Inc.

F
8 total complaints 3 last 12mo → stable

FRESNO CREDIT BUREAU

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Weber & Olcese, PLC

D
8 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

MNE Services, Inc

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Glass Mountain Capital, LLC

D
4 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Midwest Fidelity Services, LLC

C
5 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

RMS-Recovery Management Services, Inc.

C
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Federal Adjustment Bureau, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Terrill Outsourcing Group

C
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Valentine and Kebartas, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Ascension Point Recovery Services, LLC

C
3 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Harpeth Financial Services, LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Kovo

F
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

UHG, LLC

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

LendingPoint Holdings LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Lewis, McDonnell & Associates

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Worldwide Processing Group, LLC

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

BMO Bank, N.A.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

STONELEIGH RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

LoanCare, LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

COLLECTIONS USA, INC.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Solar Mosaic LLC

F
4 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

LOBEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Global Trust Management LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Integrity Solution Services, Inc.

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Oxford Law, LLC

C
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Immediate Credit Recovery

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

KeyBridge Medical Revenue Management

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Everest Receivable Services Inc.

C
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Recovery One, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

WLCC

C
3 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Nations Recovery Center

D
5 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

FMS Inc.

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Keynote Consulting, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Access Receivables of NC Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Universal Recovery Corporation

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

A & O Recovery Solutions, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Fairway Capital Recovery, LLC

C
9 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Blakely-Witt and Associates, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

NPAS, Inc.

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

National Recovery Solutions, LLC

C
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Eastpoint Recovery Group, Inc

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Big Picture Loans, LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

PRESTIGE FINANCIAL SERVICES INC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Diaz & Associates, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

United Resource Systems, Inc

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Kentucky appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Kentucky residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Kentucky Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Kentucky attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Kentucky). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Kentucky-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Kentucky reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Kentucky's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.