State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Hawaii

1,990 CFPB complaints filed against 458 debt collectors active in Hawaii.

Complaints
1,990
Collectors
458
Per 100k
139

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Hawaii Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws — contact the Hawaii Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Hawaii

Consumers in Hawaii have filed 1,990 CFPB debt collection complaints against 458 different collectors — a rate of 138.7 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Hawaii and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Hawaii is Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Hawaii-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors — Page 8

Sorted by most complaints

DFC Global Corp.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

American Capital Enterprises, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Servicing Solutions, LLC

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

National Recoveries, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Pinnacle Asset Management, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Aldridge Pite, LLP

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Delray Capital, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Rocket Mortgage, LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

AA Recovery Solutions, Inc.

F
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Michel Law, LLC d/b/a Level One Law

F
3 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↓ falling

Statebridge Company

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Sortis Financial, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Zenith Financial Network Inc

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Revenue Assurance Professionals LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Gordon, Aylworth & Tami, P.C.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Allgate Financial, LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Brennan & Clark, Ltd., LLC

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

DCN Holdings Inc.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Accelerated Servicing Group LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Columbia Recovery Group LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Check Security Associates, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Central Research Inc

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Law Offices of Robert A. Schuerger Co., LPA

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

DCI Credit Services, Inc.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Data Search NY, Inc.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

SN SERVICING CORPORATION

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

UNIVERSAL ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION (NE)

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

American Student Assistance

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Flagstar Bank, N.A.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Prime Recovery LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Talbot, Adams, & Moore, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

J.S Resolution Group, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

MIDCOUNTRY FINANCIAL CORP

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Continental Central Credit, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Optima Recovery Services LLC.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION, THE

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo → stable

Allegiant Capital Recovery LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Systematic National Collection, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Armor Systems Corporation

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Interstate Recovery Service, Inc.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Collection Attorneys USA LLC

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Universal Account Servicing, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Servis One, Inc., Titusville, PA Branch

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Direct Capital

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Premier Holdings

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Residential Credit Solutions, Inc.

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

GUARDIAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT HAWAII, LLC

C
25 total complaints 6 last 12mo ↑ rising

Accelerated Receivables Solutions

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Greeting Team, LLC DBA Customer Care Global

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Hawaii appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Hawaii residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Hawaii Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Hawaii attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Hawaii). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Hawaii-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Hawaii reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Hawaii's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.