State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Ohio

30,195 CFPB complaints filed against 1,483 debt collectors active in Ohio.

Complaints
30,195
Collectors
1,483
Top collector
Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Ohio at a glance

Ohio consumers have filed 30,195 CFPB debt-collection complaints against 1,483 collectors.

30,195
CFPB complaints filed
1,483
collectors active here
#1
most-complained: Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

State-of-residence is the consumer's address at filing, not the collector's. A complaint is a consumer filing, not a proven violation.

Ohio Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws, contact the Ohio Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Ohio

Consumers in Ohio have filed 30,195 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,483 different collectors. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Ohio and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself, not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Ohio is Resurgent Capital Services L.P., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Ohio-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA, licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds, see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors - Page 27

Sorted by most complaints

Northern Ohio Investment Company

C
1 total complaints ↑ rising

NPAS, Inc.

F
1 total complaints → stable

NPG Associates, Inc.

D
1 total complaints ↑ rising

NPS Group

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

National Debt Holdings, LLC

D
1 total complaints ↑ rising

National Healthcare Collections, LLC

D
1 total complaints ↑ rising

National Mediation Services

B
1 total complaints ↓ falling

National Processing Group LLC

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

National Recovery Services LLC

B
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Nationwide Arbitration Services LLC

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Nationwide Credit & Collection, Inc.

D
1 total complaints → stable

Nationwide Credit Corporation

D
1 total complaints → stable

Nelson and Kennard, LLP

D
1 total complaints → stable

NerdWallet, Inc.

B
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Netspend Corporation

B
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Neuhauser Law PLLC

A
1 total complaints ↓ falling

New Century Auto Sales, Inc.

B
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Nextep Funding LLP

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Niagara Credit Solutions, Inc

B
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Nickel City Group LLC

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Northern Arizona Credit, Inc.

B
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Novea Portfolio Management LLC

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

O&L LAW Group, P.L.

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Onemain Finance Corporation

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Oportun Financial Corporation

C
1 total complaints ↑ rising

OSG Group Holdings, Inc.

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Obligo Inc.

B
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Omni AR, LLC

F
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Omnipoint Capital

F
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Opportunity Fund

C
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Origen Capital Investments II, LLC

A
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Orions Management Group, LLC

D
1 total complaints → stable

Outsource Services, Inc. d/b/a National Acceptance Company

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

P&L Acquisitions LLC

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Pacific Capital Exchange

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

PC Legal Services, LLC

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

PCMA, Inc.

A
1 total complaints ↓ falling

PDQ Services, Inc.

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Perdue Brandon Fielder Collins & Mott LLP

F
1 total complaints → stable

PMT Solutions, LLC.

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

PPM Capital Inc.

A
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Pacific Collections

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Pacific Financial Group (Closed)

B
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Partners Financial Services Inc

B
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Peritus Portfolio Services II, LLC

B
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Phillips, Reinhard & Associates

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Physicians & Dentists Credit Bureau

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Pinnacle Asset Management, LLC

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

PlusFour, Inc

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Pollack & Rosen, P.A.

D
1 total complaints → stable

If a collector is contacting you in Ohio

Federal FDCPA rights apply everywhere; some state protections go further.

  • Check the collector's national record and grade before you respond or pay. Browse rankings
  • Demand written debt validation within 30 days of first contact. Validation letter
  • File with the CFPB, your Ohio attorney general, or the state finance regulator, the three channels run in parallel. Your rights

Per-capita rate reflects where consumers file, not collector misconduct. Not legal advice, for your situation, consult a licensed attorney.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Ohio appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Ohio residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against company activity (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), consumer-dispute rate (the share of company responses consumers flagged as inadequate), and complaint trend (whether recent volume is rising, stable, or falling). The composite is bucketed A through F on a curve, each grade holds roughly a fifth of the 5,283 graded collectors, so an F reflects the weakest ~20% relative to peers, not an absolute threshold. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Ohio Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint - the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Ohio attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Ohio). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Ohio-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Ohio reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies, a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Ohio's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector, they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.