State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in New York

53,744 CFPB complaints filed against 1,598 debt collectors active in New York.

Complaints
53,744
Collectors
1,598
Top collector
Transunion Intermediate Holdings, Inc.

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

New York at a glance

New York consumers have filed 53,744 CFPB debt-collection complaints against 1,598 collectors.

53,744
CFPB complaints filed
1,598
collectors active here
#1
most-complained: Transunion Intermediate Holdings, Inc.

State-of-residence is the consumer's address at filing, not the collector's. A complaint is a consumer filing, not a proven violation.

New York Debt Collection Laws

New York has strong debt collection laws. NYC additionally requires collector licensing. Collectors must identify themselves and cannot threaten arrest.

State Mini-FDCPALicensing Required

Contact your state attorney general for current enforcement information.

Insights: Debt Collection in New York

Consumers in New York have filed 53,744 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,598 different collectors. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in New York and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself, not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in New York is Transunion Intermediate Holdings, Inc., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical New York-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA, licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds, see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors - Page 21

Sorted by most complaints

RAB, Inc.

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

RAS LaVrar, LLC

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Ragan & Ragan, PC

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Receivable Recovery Services, LLC

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Receivable Solutions LLC

D
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Receivables Management Associates

B
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Red Target LLC

D
2 total complaints → stable

Regional Management Corporation

D
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Retention Consulting Services Inc.

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Revenue Enterprises, LLC

D
2 total complaints → stable

Riexinger & Associates, LLC

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Risecredit, LLC

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Rosebud Economic Development Corporation

C
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Scott Fetzer Financial Group Inc.

C
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Sequoia Financial Services

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Sherloq Group, Inc

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Siggi LLC

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Snap Recovery, Inc.

D
2 total complaints ↑ rising

SoLo Funds Inc.

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Starmark Financial LLC

F
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Stein & Stein, LLP

A
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Stellantis Financial Services US Corp.

D
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Stillman, P.C. d.b.a. Stillman Law Office

D
2 total complaints → stable

Suburban Credit Corporation

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Sunbit, Inc.

F
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Systematic National Collection, Inc.

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

TAG Intermediate Holding Company, LLC

B
2 total complaints ↓ falling

TCAR Inc

A
2 total complaints ↓ falling

TCF National Bank

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

THE J.D. Stuart LAW Group, LLC

B
2 total complaints → stable

TMX Finance LLC

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Trinity Hope Associates

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Trustmark Corporation

B
2 total complaints ↑ rising

TaxServ, LLC

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

The Affiliated Group, Inc

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

The Allen Daniel Associates, Inc.

D
2 total complaints ↑ rising

The Best Service Co.,Inc

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

The Law Firm of Allan C. Smith

B
2 total complaints ↓ falling

The Law Office of John P. Frye P.C.

B
2 total complaints ↓ falling

The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

The Minacs Group (USA) Inc.

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

The Wilber Law Firm, P.C.

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Thomas George Associates, Ltd.

D
2 total complaints → stable

Tiburon Financial, LLC

A
2 total complaints → stable

Tilt Finance, Inc.

C
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Total Customer Service, Inc.

B
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Unisa, Inc

D
2 total complaints ↑ rising

United Check Recovery Bureau, Inc.

C
2 total complaints → stable

United Consumers Inc

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Universal Account Servicing, LLC

D
2 total complaints → stable

If a collector is contacting you in New York

Federal FDCPA rights apply everywhere; some state protections go further.

  • Check the collector's national record and grade before you respond or pay. Browse rankings
  • Demand written debt validation within 30 days of first contact. Validation letter
  • File with the CFPB, your New York attorney general, or the state finance regulator, the three channels run in parallel. Your rights

Per-capita rate reflects where consumers file, not collector misconduct. Not legal advice, for your situation, consult a licensed attorney.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for New York appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from New York residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against company activity (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), consumer-dispute rate (the share of company responses consumers flagged as inadequate), and complaint trend (whether recent volume is rising, stable, or falling). The composite is bucketed A through F on a curve, each grade holds roughly a fifth of the 5,283 graded collectors, so an F reflects the weakest ~20% relative to peers, not an absolute threshold. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a New York Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint - the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the New York attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in New York). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the New York-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in New York reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies, a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against New York's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector, they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.