State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Maine

1,491 CFPB complaints filed against 367 debt collectors active in Maine.

Complaints
1,491
Collectors
367
Per 100k
107

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Maine Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws — contact the Maine Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Maine

Consumers in Maine have filed 1,491 CFPB debt collection complaints against 367 different collectors — a rate of 106.8 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Maine and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Maine is The Thomas Agency, Inc., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Maine-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors — Page 7

Sorted by most complaints

Malcolm S. Gerald and Associates, Inc.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Accelerated Servicing Group LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Climb Credit Inc.

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Schreiber Law LLC

D
5 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

The Affiliated Group, Inc

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Premier Portfolio Group

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Law Offices of Robert A. Schuerger Co., LPA

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Data Search NY, Inc.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

SN SERVICING CORPORATION

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

We Collect Inc

F
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↓ falling

PLANET HOME LENDING, LLC

C
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Citi Management Group, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

National Arbitration Forum

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Earm LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Community Cash Management Corp.

C
27 total complaints 1 last 12mo → stable

Gragil Associates, Inc.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Global Portfolio Recovery, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Professional Credit Analysts of MN, Inc.

B
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Rubin & Yates, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Comerica

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Lotane & Associates, P.A.

B
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↓ falling

BAM Financial, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

New Hampshire Northeast Credit Services, Inc.

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

SACOR FINANCIAL, INC

C
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Direct Capital

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

NEW YORK STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SERVICES CORPORATION (HESC)—

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Premier Holdings

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

C & M Associates Group, Inc.

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Estate Information Services, LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Guidiville Indian Rancheria

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

MFP, inc.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Law Office of J.A. Cambece

D
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

First Step Group, LLC

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Streamline Recovery Inc

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Regional Acquisition Group, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Greystone Alliance LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

FinCo Services Inc DBA Current

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Scratch Services, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

ABSOLUTE CREDIT LLC

D
3 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↓ falling

Southwest Mediation Service

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Figure Technologies, Inc

C
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Abrahamsen Ratchford, P.C

D
4 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Regional Processing Services

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

VeriCore, LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

TaxServ, LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Centric Asset Management Inc

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Asset Collections Inc

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Innovative Credit Solutions

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Samuel Whitaker & Associates LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

College Assist

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Maine appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Maine residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Maine Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Maine attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Maine). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Maine-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Maine reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Maine's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.