State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Arkansas

8,306 CFPB complaints filed against 758 debt collectors active in Arkansas.

Complaints
8,306
Collectors
758
Top collector
Equifax, Inc.

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Arkansas at a glance

Arkansas consumers have filed 8,306 CFPB debt-collection complaints against 758 collectors.

8,306
CFPB complaints filed
758
collectors active here
#1
most-complained: Equifax, Inc.

State-of-residence is the consumer's address at filing, not the collector's. A complaint is a consumer filing, not a proven violation.

Arkansas Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws, contact the Arkansas Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Arkansas

Consumers in Arkansas have filed 8,306 CFPB debt collection complaints against 758 different collectors. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Arkansas and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself, not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Arkansas is Equifax, Inc., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Arkansas-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA, licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds, see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors - Page 4

Sorted by most complaints

Westlake Services, LLC

D
8 total complaints ↑ rising

Avante

D
7 total complaints ↓ falling

Atlanticus Services Corporation

D
7 total complaints ↑ rising

Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation

D
7 total complaints ↑ rising

CURO Intermediate Holdings

D
7 total complaints ↓ falling

Cannon Finance, Inc.

B
7 total complaints ↑ rising

Carter-Young, Inc.

F
7 total complaints → stable

Continental Services Group, Inc. d/b/a ConServe

C
7 total complaints → stable

Couch Lambert LLC

D
7 total complaints → stable

Credit Control Company, Inc.

C
7 total complaints ↓ falling

Credit Corp Solutions Inc.

D
7 total complaints ↑ rising

Credit Systems International, Inc.

D
7 total complaints ↑ rising

Financial Recovery Services, Inc.

D
7 total complaints ↓ falling

Focus Holding Company

D
7 total complaints ↓ falling

Hovg, LLC

F
7 total complaints ↓ falling

Hosto & Buchan, PLLC

C
7 total complaints ↓ falling

JH Portfolio Debt Equities, LLC

D
7 total complaints ↓ falling

McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc.

D
7 total complaints ↓ falling

Nationwide Capital Services, LLC

F
7 total complaints ↑ rising

ORG GC GP Buyer, LLC

D
7 total complaints ↓ falling

Opportunity Financial, LLC

C
7 total complaints ↑ rising

Performant Financial Corporation

D
7 total complaints ↓ falling

Pinnacle Credit Services, LLC

D
7 total complaints ↓ falling

Truist Financial Corporation

F
7 total complaints ↑ rising

AMCOL Systems, Inc.

D
6 total complaints ↓ falling

American Honda Finance Corp

D
6 total complaints → stable

Alorica Inc.

D
6 total complaints ↓ falling

American Coradius International LLC

D
6 total complaints ↓ falling

Byrider Franchising, LLC

D
6 total complaints → stable

Cascade Capital, LLC

D
6 total complaints → stable

Credit Protection Association, L.P.

D
6 total complaints ↓ falling

Dynamic Recovery Solutions, LLC

D
6 total complaints ↓ falling

EdFinancial Services

D
6 total complaints ↑ rising

Financial Credit Service, Inc.

D
6 total complaints ↓ falling

Frost-Arnett Company

D
6 total complaints ↓ falling

Gamache & Myers, PC

C
6 total complaints ↓ falling

Global Lending Services LLC

D
6 total complaints ↑ rising

John Gibson Auto Sales, Inc.

B
6 total complaints ↓ falling

January Technologies, Inc

F
6 total complaints ↑ rising

Klarna AB

F
6 total complaints ↑ rising

MSCB, Inc.

D
6 total complaints → stable

Omega RMS, LLC

D
6 total complaints ↑ rising

Prince Parker & Associates

D
6 total complaints → stable

RS Clark and Associates, Inc.

F
6 total complaints → stable

Riverwalk Financial Corporation

F
6 total complaints ↓ falling

The Receivable Management Services LLC

D
6 total complaints ↑ rising

United PanAm Financial Corp.

C
6 total complaints ↑ rising

2288984 Ontario Inc.

C
5 total complaints ↑ rising

AES/Pheaa

D
5 total complaints ↓ falling

Ad Astra Recovery Services Inc

D
5 total complaints ↓ falling

If a collector is contacting you in Arkansas

Federal FDCPA rights apply everywhere; some state protections go further.

  • Check the collector's national record and grade before you respond or pay. Browse rankings
  • Demand written debt validation within 30 days of first contact. Validation letter
  • File with the CFPB, your Arkansas attorney general, or the state finance regulator, the three channels run in parallel. Your rights

Per-capita rate reflects where consumers file, not collector misconduct. Not legal advice, for your situation, consult a licensed attorney.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Arkansas appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Arkansas residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against company activity (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), consumer-dispute rate (the share of company responses consumers flagged as inadequate), and complaint trend (whether recent volume is rising, stable, or falling). The composite is bucketed A through F on a curve, each grade holds roughly a fifth of the 5,283 graded collectors, so an F reflects the weakest ~20% relative to peers, not an absolute threshold. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Arkansas Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint - the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Arkansas attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Arkansas). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Arkansas-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Arkansas reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies, a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Arkansas's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector, they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.