State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Arkansas

7,680 CFPB complaints filed against 751 debt collectors active in Arkansas.

Complaints
7,680
Collectors
751
Per 100k
250

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Arkansas Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws — contact the Arkansas Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Arkansas

Consumers in Arkansas have filed 7,680 CFPB debt collection complaints against 751 different collectors — a rate of 250.3 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Arkansas and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Arkansas is EQUIFAX, INC., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Arkansas-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors — Page 2

Sorted by most complaints

NRA Group, LLC

D
21 total complaints 10 last 12mo ↑ rising

TD BANK US HOLDING COMPANY

D
6 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

Ability Recovery Services, LLC

F
31 total complaints 9 last 12mo ↑ rising

Source Receivables Management LLC

D
10 total complaints 4 last 12mo ↑ rising

Capio Partners, LLC

D
19 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

ONLINE Information Services, Inc.

D
14 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

The CMI Group, Inc.

D
20 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Security Credit Services, LLC

D
22 total complaints 5 last 12mo ↑ rising

BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE

D
17 total complaints 5 last 12mo ↑ rising

EOS Holdings, Inc.

D
9 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Phoenix Financial Services LLC

D
19 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Credit Control, LLC

F
19 total complaints 8 last 12mo ↑ rising

Eastern Account Systems of Connecticut, Inc.

D
12 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

Aargon Agency, Inc.

F
7 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

ALLY FINANCIAL INC.

D
33 total complaints 9 last 12mo ↑ rising

Debt Recovery Solutions, LLC

D
9 total complaints 3 last 12mo → stable

MRS BPO, LLC

D
13 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Medical Data Systems, Inc.

D
16 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION

D
45 total complaints 17 last 12mo ↑ rising

WAKEFIELD & ASSOCIATES, INC.

F
10 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Receivables Performance Management, LLC

D
8 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Penn Credit Corporation

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

V and H Portfolio

D
19 total complaints 11 last 12mo ↑ rising

Credit Corp Solutions Inc.

D
7 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Westlake Services, LLC

D
5 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

Central Portfolio Control Inc.

D
16 total complaints 9 last 12mo ↑ rising

Rent Recovery Solutions

F
18 total complaints 8 last 12mo ↑ rising

Self Financial Inc.

F
35 total complaints 21 last 12mo ↑ rising

Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc.

D
13 total complaints 4 last 12mo → stable

HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS INC.

D
11 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

AmeriCollect

D
3 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC.

F
24 total complaints 10 last 12mo ↑ rising

U.S. BANCORP

D
17 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Velocity Portfolio Group

D
25 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↓ falling

Collection Management Holdings, LLC

F
8 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

LJ Ross Associates

D
3 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

Bull City Financial Solutions, Inc

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

CMRE Financial Services, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc.

D
11 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

IQOR US INC

D
14 total complaints 1 last 12mo → stable

OneMain Finance Corporation

F
4 total complaints 4 last 12mo ↑ rising

Dynamic Recovery Solutions, LLC

D
6 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

CURO Intermediate Holdings

D
7 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Lockhart, Morris & Montgomery Inc.

D
10 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

Credit Systems International, Inc.

D
6 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Halsted Financial Services, LLC.

D
13 total complaints 6 last 12mo ↑ rising

RentDebt Automated Collections, LLC

D
11 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

Nelnet, Inc.

D
14 total complaints 7 last 12mo ↑ rising

Consumer Adjustment Company Incorporated

D
4 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Paypal Holdings, Inc

D
8 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Arkansas appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Arkansas residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Arkansas Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Arkansas attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Arkansas). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Arkansas-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Arkansas reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Arkansas's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.