State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Pennsylvania

36,944 CFPB complaints filed against 1,439 debt collectors active in Pennsylvania.

Complaints
36,944
Collectors
1,439
Per 100k
285

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Pennsylvania Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws — contact the Pennsylvania Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Pennsylvania

Consumers in Pennsylvania have filed 36,944 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,439 different collectors — a rate of 285.0 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Pennsylvania and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Pennsylvania is TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Pennsylvania-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors — Page 26

Sorted by most complaints

ACCOUNTS ADVOCATE AGENCY

D
10 total complaints 4 last 12mo ↑ rising

LPI, INC.

C
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Samuel Whitaker & Associates LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Marine One Acceptance Corporation

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

DK, Consulting, Inc dba Huntington Financial Services

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC

B
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Hawes Klein LLC

F
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

FIRST FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

COOPER HEALTH SYSTEM

B
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Lentegrity Management, LLC

C
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Aspen Yo LLC

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

CLX Systems/ Westwood Management

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Nudelman, Klemm & Golub, P.C.

C
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

National Creditors Connection, Inc

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

The Cadle Company

B
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

GreenPath, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

DEBT CREDIT SERVICES

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Deutsche Bank

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Compattia Roccia Management Group, LLC

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Law Office of Charles G. McCarthy Jr. & Assoc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Northeast Receivables Management, LLC

C
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Qualey Law Group, Inc.

B
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Allied Financial Group & Associates (Closed)

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Robert W. Warner & Associates, P.C.

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Nobilis Credit Management, LLC.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Trustly, Inc.

B
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

CFAM Financial Services, LLC

F
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

College Loan Corporation

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Revenue Collection Bureau, Inc.

D
4 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Funding Metrics LLC

B
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

GUARANTEED RATE INC.

B
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Southwood Financial, LLC.

B
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

NE PROCESSING LLC

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Location Services Holdings, LLC

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Landmark Strategy Group, LLC

C
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Law Offices of Ed Overcash, LLC

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Ingo Money, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Thomas & Thomas Attorneys and Counselors at Law, LLC

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Rosen Management Services Inc.

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Ronald H. Reynolds, Inc.

B
8 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

College Ave Student Loan Servicing, LLC

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

RMI Services, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

First Credit Corporation

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Davis and Goldmark, Inc.

B
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

CFS Holdings, Inc

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Statewide Tax Recovery, LLC

F
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Upstate Remedial Management Inc

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Credit Wellness LLC

B
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

United Consumer Finance, Inc.

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

National Recovery Services LLC

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Pennsylvania appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Pennsylvania residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Pennsylvania Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Pennsylvania attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Pennsylvania). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Pennsylvania-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Pennsylvania reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Pennsylvania's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.