State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in New Jersey

28,584 CFPB complaints filed against 1,274 debt collectors active in New Jersey.

Complaints
28,584
Collectors
1,274
Per 100k
308

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

New Jersey Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws — contact the New Jersey Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in New Jersey

Consumers in New Jersey have filed 28,584 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,274 different collectors — a rate of 307.7 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in New Jersey and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in New Jersey is Resurgent Capital Services L.P., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical New Jersey-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors — Page 24

Sorted by most complaints

Leaders Financial Company

B
3 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

Accurate Financial Services

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

XOOM CORPORATION

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Duane Morris LLP

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

FALONI & ASSOCIATES, LLC

B
6 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Integrity Asset Partners, Ltd.

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Universal Technical Institute

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

South West Recovery Inc (CA)

F
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↓ falling

Olde City Financial Inc.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

STEWARD FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

REMAX

B
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Pluese, Becker & Saltzman, LLC

B
6 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Chrebet Associates LLC

B
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Cornerstone Mitigation

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

BYS, LLC. d/b/a Boost Your Score

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Alperstein and Associates, LLC

C
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

CITY NATIONAL BANK

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Moyer Brown Holdings Enterprise, LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Healthcare Collection Specialists, Inc.

B
5 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

Law Offices of Ross Gelfand, LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Investigation & Recovery Assoc. LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Udren Law Offices, P.C.

F
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Oak Tree Financial Inc.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Cohn & Dussi LLC

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

AMA Advisors, LLC.

A
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Sulphur Bank Rancheria Enterprises

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Amity Associates LLC

F
5 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

LCB Rent Reporting Ltd.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

SilverLake Financial LLC

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

MCS CLAIMS SERVICES, INC

C
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Wexford & James LLC

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

One Source Technology

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Peoples Commerce Inc

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Southern Credit LLC

F
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Student Loan Financial Assistance

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Sure Recovery Service LLC

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

ATLANTIC PACIFIC MORTGAGE CORP

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Panteris & Panteris, LLP

A
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Pacific Union Financial, LLC

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Debt Restoration Services

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

VANGUARD FUNDING LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Medical Services Inc

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

EIC Enterprises

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Innovative Debt Solutions

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Broder Credit & Collection Service

F
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Nationwide Judgement Recovery, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

PLAZA HOME MORTGAGE, INC.

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Greyhill Financial

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Marvel & Maloney, P.C.

B
4 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

ROBERT TIMMS AND ASSOCIATES INC.

B
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for New Jersey appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from New Jersey residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a New Jersey Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the New Jersey attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in New Jersey). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the New Jersey-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in New Jersey reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against New Jersey's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.