State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Kentucky

7,180 CFPB complaints filed against 861 debt collectors active in Kentucky.

Complaints
7,180
Collectors
861
Top collector
GLA Collection Company, Inc.

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Kentucky at a glance

Kentucky consumers have filed 7,180 CFPB debt-collection complaints against 861 collectors.

7,180
CFPB complaints filed
861
collectors active here
#1
most-complained: GLA Collection Company, Inc.

State-of-residence is the consumer's address at filing, not the collector's. A complaint is a consumer filing, not a proven violation.

Kentucky Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws, contact the Kentucky Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Kentucky

Consumers in Kentucky have filed 7,180 CFPB debt collection complaints against 861 different collectors. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Kentucky and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself, not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Kentucky is GLA Collection Company, Inc., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Kentucky-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA, licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds, see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors - Page 16

Sorted by most complaints

Premier Portfolio Group

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Pressler & Pressler, LLP

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Prime Credit Corporation

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Professional Adjustment Corp. of S.W. FL., Inc.

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Professional Bureau of Collections of Maryland, Inc., GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO Branch

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Professional Collectors Corp.

D
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Progressive Financial Services, Inc.

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Property Receivables, Corp

F
1 total complaints ↑ rising

QC Holdings Inc

C
1 total complaints → stable

Quest Legal Group

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

R.T.R. Financial Services, Inc.

D
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Randolph-Brooks Federal Credit Union

D
1 total complaints ↑ rising

RAS LaVrar, LLC

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

RMB, Inc.

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

RMI Services, LLC

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Rausch Sturm LLP

F
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Razor Capital, LLC

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Real Time Group, Inc.

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Receivable Solutions, Inc.

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Receivables Management Corporation

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Recovery One, LLC

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Reel Time Capital LLC

D
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Reimer, Arnovitz, Chernek &Jeffrey Co., LPA

B
1 total complaints ↓ falling

ResidentCollect, Inc.

F
1 total complaints → stable

Resource Management Group

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

RevNow LLC

D
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Revco Management, LLC

F
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Rhojo Enterprises, LLC

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Richard J. Boudreau & Associates, LLC

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Richland Bureau of Credits Medical Service Bureau Inc.

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Risecredit, LLC

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

River City Finance Co., Inc.

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Roadrunner Account Services, LLC

D
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Rose & Associates, LLC.

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Rosebud Economic Development Corporation

C
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Rosenberg & Associates Recovery Services

F
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Rossman & Co & PCB

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

RoundPoint Mortgage Servicing LLC

C
1 total complaints → stable

Rubin & Yates, LLC

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Russell Collection Agency, Inc

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Security Credit Systems Inc

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

SIMM Associates, Inc.

D
1 total complaints → stable

SOP Pioneer Partners LP

C
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Samuel Whitaker & Associates LLC

F
1 total complaints → stable

Scheer, Green & Burke L.P.A.

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Scott Lowery Law Office, P.C.

B
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Searay Portfolio Management

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Second Round Limited Partnership, Austin, TX Branch

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Seidberg Law Offices, P.C.

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

If a collector is contacting you in Kentucky

Federal FDCPA rights apply everywhere; some state protections go further.

  • Check the collector's national record and grade before you respond or pay. Browse rankings
  • Demand written debt validation within 30 days of first contact. Validation letter
  • File with the CFPB, your Kentucky attorney general, or the state finance regulator, the three channels run in parallel. Your rights

Per-capita rate reflects where consumers file, not collector misconduct. Not legal advice, for your situation, consult a licensed attorney.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Kentucky appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Kentucky residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against company activity (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), consumer-dispute rate (the share of company responses consumers flagged as inadequate), and complaint trend (whether recent volume is rising, stable, or falling). The composite is bucketed A through F on a curve, each grade holds roughly a fifth of the 5,283 graded collectors, so an F reflects the weakest ~20% relative to peers, not an absolute threshold. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Kentucky Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint - the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Kentucky attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Kentucky). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Kentucky-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Kentucky reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies, a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Kentucky's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector, they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.