State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Virginia

27,934 CFPB complaints filed against 1,426 debt collectors active in Virginia.

Complaints
27,934
Collectors
1,426
Top collector
Equifax, Inc.

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Virginia at a glance

Virginia consumers have filed 27,934 CFPB debt-collection complaints against 1,426 collectors.

27,934
CFPB complaints filed
1,426
collectors active here
#1
most-complained: Equifax, Inc.

State-of-residence is the consumer's address at filing, not the collector's. A complaint is a consumer filing, not a proven violation.

Insights: Debt Collection in Virginia

Consumers in Virginia have filed 27,934 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,426 different collectors. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Virginia and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

A per-capita complaint rate is a filing rate, not a measure of misconduct or of a state's legal protections. It can be affected by population estimates, awareness of the CFPB complaint channel, the mix of creditors and collectors, and other factors that this dataset does not measure.

The collector with the most complaints from Virginia residents in this dataset is Equifax, Inc.. Use the record as one input when researching a company; it does not establish a legal violation or answer a state-law question.

Active Debt Collectors - Page 11

Sorted by most complaints

American Accounts & Advisers, Inc.

D
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Apelles, LLC

C
4 total complaints → stable

Arcadia Holdings, LLC

F
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Arnold Scott Harris, P.C.

D
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Avid Acceptance, LLC

B
4 total complaints ↑ rising

Axela Technologies, Inc

D
4 total complaints ↑ rising

BYL Collection Services

D
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Ballato Law Firm, P.C.

C
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Benuck & Rainey, Inc.

F
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Business Processing Solutions, LLC

D
4 total complaints ↑ rising

CIT Bank, National Association

C
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Conrad Credit Corporation

F
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Cawthorn, Deskevich & Gavin, P.c.

B
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Collins Asset Group, LLC

F
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Community Health Investment Company, LLC.

D
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Complete Collection Services, Inc.

A
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Credit International Corporation

C
4 total complaints → stable

Critical Resolution Mediation LLC

F
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Dynamic Recovery Services, Inc.

F
4 total complaints ↓ falling

DataMax Corporation

F
4 total complaints ↓ falling

E. Margriet Langenberg, P.C.

C
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Eastpoint Recovery Group, Inc

D
4 total complaints ↓ falling

FEDChex Recovery, LLC

F
4 total complaints ↑ rising

First Horizon Bank

C
4 total complaints ↓ falling

FMA Alliance, Ltd.

C
4 total complaints → stable

Global Recovery Group

F
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Global Trust Management LLC

C
4 total complaints → stable

Global United Arbitration LLC

C
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Hollis Cobb Associates

D
4 total complaints → stable

Home Point Financial Corporation

C
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Horizon Financial Management

B
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Integrated Recovery Services

F
4 total complaints ↓ falling

KLS Financial Services, Inc

F
4 total complaints → stable

Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC

F
4 total complaints ↓ falling

LTD Financial Services, L.P.

D
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Law Office of Brett M. Borland, P.C.

F
4 total complaints ↑ rising

M&T Bank Corporation

C
4 total complaints → stable

Midcountry Financial Corp

C
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Marlette Funding, LLC

D
4 total complaints ↑ rising

Mid-America Accounts Control Bureau, Inc.

C
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Mid-Atlantic Finance Co., Inc.

D
4 total complaints ↑ rising

Mirand Response Systems, Inc.

C
4 total complaints ↑ rising

Mnet Financial Inc

C
4 total complaints → stable

Municipal Collections of America Inc.

D
4 total complaints ↓ falling

NEW York State Higher Education Services Corporation (Hesc)—

B
4 total complaints ↓ falling

National Arbitration Forum

F
4 total complaints ↓ falling

National Collection Systems, Inc.

D
4 total complaints → stable

National Medical Administrators, Inc

C
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Nations Recovery Center

D
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Nationwide Credit & Collection, Inc.

D
4 total complaints → stable

If a collector is contacting you in Virginia

Start with the federal complaint record, then verify any state-law question with an official source.

  • Check the collector's national record and grade before you respond or pay. Browse rankings
  • Demand written debt validation within 30 days of first contact. Validation letter
  • Use the CFPB complaint process and check official Virginia resources for state-specific options. Your rights

Per-capita rate reflects consumer filings, not collector misconduct or a legal conclusion. This is not legal advice.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Virginia appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Virginia residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against company activity (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), consumer-dispute rate (the share of company responses consumers flagged as inadequate), and complaint trend (whether recent volume is rising, stable, or falling). The composite is bucketed A through F on a curve, each grade holds roughly a fifth of the 5,283 graded collectors, so an F reflects the weakest ~20% relative to peers, not an absolute threshold. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Virginia Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint - the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Virginia attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Virginia). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Virginia-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Virginia reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies, a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Virginia's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector, they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.