State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Virginia

27,934 CFPB complaints filed against 1,426 debt collectors active in Virginia.

Complaints
27,934
Collectors
1,426
Top collector
Equifax, Inc.

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Virginia at a glance

Virginia consumers have filed 27,934 CFPB debt-collection complaints against 1,426 collectors.

27,934
CFPB complaints filed
1,426
collectors active here
#1
most-complained: Equifax, Inc.

State-of-residence is the consumer's address at filing, not the collector's. A complaint is a consumer filing, not a proven violation.

Virginia Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws, contact the Virginia Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Virginia

Consumers in Virginia have filed 27,934 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,426 different collectors. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Virginia and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself, not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Virginia is Equifax, Inc., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Virginia-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA, licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds, see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Most-complained-about collectors in Virginia

By complaints filed from this state

complaints

What this shows These eight collectors draw the most complaints from Virginia residents, usually national bureaus and large debt buyers operating in every state.

Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Active Debt Collectors

Sorted by most complaints

Equifax, Inc.

D
1,718 total complaints ↑ rising

Transunion Intermediate Holdings, Inc.

D
1,473 total complaints ↑ rising

Experian Information Solutions Inc.

D
1,214 total complaints ↑ rising

Encore Capital Group Inc.

D
1,182 total complaints ↑ rising

Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

D
1,094 total complaints ↑ rising

Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

D
1,076 total complaints ↑ rising

CL Holdings LLC

D
1,023 total complaints ↑ rising

R & B Corporation of Virginia

D
585 total complaints ↓ falling

Transworld Systems Inc

D
506 total complaints → stable

CCS Financial Services, Inc.

F
406 total complaints ↑ rising

Kriya Capital, LLC

D
355 total complaints ↑ rising

Capital ONE Financial Corporation

D
347 total complaints → stable

I.C. System, Inc.

D
330 total complaints ↑ rising

Synchrony Financial

D
293 total complaints → stable

Citibank, N.a.

D
258 total complaints → stable

National Credit Systems,Inc.

D
248 total complaints ↑ rising

Southwest Credit Systems, L.P.

D
236 total complaints → stable

Caine & Weiner Company, Inc.

D
231 total complaints ↑ rising

Io, Inc.

D
221 total complaints ↓ falling

ERC

D
209 total complaints ↓ falling

Convergent Resources, Inc.

D
208 total complaints ↓ falling

Navy Federal Credit Union

D
197 total complaints ↑ rising

HW Holding, Inc

D
196 total complaints → stable

Radius Global Solutions LLC

D
196 total complaints ↑ rising

Bank of America, National Association

D
195 total complaints → stable

Glasser and Glasser, PLC

D
190 total complaints → stable

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc.

D
187 total complaints ↑ rising

Wells Fargo & Company

D
183 total complaints ↑ rising

Fair Collections & Outsourcing, Inc.

D
177 total complaints ↑ rising

Jpmorgan Chase & Co.

D
149 total complaints ↑ rising

National Credit Adjusters, LLC

D
148 total complaints ↑ rising

Spring Oaks Capital, LLC

F
135 total complaints ↑ rising

Harris & Harris, Ltd.

D
133 total complaints ↑ rising

Rowland Avenue Management, Inc. A/KA Columbia Debt Recovery, LLC d/b/a Genesis

F
128 total complaints ↑ rising

Enova International, Inc.

D
120 total complaints → stable

Navient Solutions, LLC.

D
120 total complaints ↓ falling

Sunrise Credit Services, Inc

D
110 total complaints ↑ rising

The CBE Group, Inc.

D
107 total complaints → stable

Discover Bank

D
103 total complaints ↓ falling

EOS Holdings, Inc.

D
102 total complaints ↓ falling

Nationwide Credit Corporation

D
102 total complaints → stable

Credit Control, LLC

F
101 total complaints ↑ rising

Contract Callers Inc

D
97 total complaints ↑ rising

Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc.

F
95 total complaints ↓ falling

American Express Company

D
94 total complaints ↑ rising

Diversified Consultants, Inc.

D
94 total complaints ↓ falling

FirstPoint Collection Resources

D
92 total complaints → stable

Klima, Peters & Daly, P.A.

D
90 total complaints → stable

Phoenix Financial Services LLC

D
90 total complaints ↓ falling

Afni Inc.

D
89 total complaints ↓ falling

If a collector is contacting you in Virginia

Federal FDCPA rights apply everywhere; some state protections go further.

  • Check the collector's national record and grade before you respond or pay. Browse rankings
  • Demand written debt validation within 30 days of first contact. Validation letter
  • File with the CFPB, your Virginia attorney general, or the state finance regulator, the three channels run in parallel. Your rights

Per-capita rate reflects where consumers file, not collector misconduct. Not legal advice, for your situation, consult a licensed attorney.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Virginia appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Virginia residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against company activity (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), consumer-dispute rate (the share of company responses consumers flagged as inadequate), and complaint trend (whether recent volume is rising, stable, or falling). The composite is bucketed A through F on a curve, each grade holds roughly a fifth of the 5,283 graded collectors, so an F reflects the weakest ~20% relative to peers, not an absolute threshold. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Virginia Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint - the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Virginia attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Virginia). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Virginia-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Virginia reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies, a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Virginia's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector, they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.