State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Texas

154,773 CFPB complaints filed against 2,454 debt collectors active in Texas.

Complaints
154,773
Collectors
2,454
Per 100k
507

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Texas Debt Collection Laws

Texas Finance Code Chapter 392 mirrors federal FDCPA protections and applies to both debt collectors and original creditors.

State Mini-FDCPA

Contact your state attorney general for current enforcement information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Texas

Consumers in Texas have filed 154,773 CFPB debt collection complaints against 2,454 different collectors — a rate of 507.4 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Texas and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Texas is EQUIFAX, INC., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Texas-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors — Page 30

Sorted by most complaints

ALPHA MIDCO INC

F
5 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Saturn Systems, Inc

C
4 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Regional Recovery Services

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Wallace Management Company, LLC

B
5 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

Central Collection Corporation

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Hollins & McVay, P.A.

C
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

MEI AUTO FINANCE INC

B
17 total complaints 6 last 12mo ↑ rising

Thomas, King & Associates

C
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

CARVANT FINANCIAL LLC

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

CULLEN/FROST BANKERS, INC.

B
19 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

USA DISCOUNTERS LTD

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

RGL Associates, Inc.

B
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Axiom Acquisition Ventures, LLC

C
4 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Cade Investments LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

JSZ Financial Co., Inc.

C
21 total complaints 5 last 12mo ↑ rising

The Sayer Law Group, P.C.

C
6 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

PLS GROUP, INC

B
8 total complaints 1 last 12mo → stable

Foursight Holding LLC

C
4 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Executive Credit Management, Inc

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Federated Capital Corporation

C
4 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Manhattan Beach Venture, LLC

F
4 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Cohen & Associates

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Rhojo Enterprises, LLC

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

American Credit Financial

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

United Acceptance Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Scratch Services, Inc.

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Net Pay Advance, Inc.

B
10 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

Reach Financial LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Borenstein & Associates, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

EDvantage LLC

B
6 total complaints 6 last 12mo ↑ rising

Certified Recovery Systems, Inc.

C
19 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Springer Collections Inc.

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Sunnova Energy Corporation

F
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

IPAC'S Inc.

F
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

The Commercial Collection Corporation of New York, Inc.

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Acceptance Solutions Group, INC

B
11 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Bison Recovery Group, Inc.

B
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Giggle Finance Inc.

F
3 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

Credit Solutions

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Mathew Aaron Holdings Inc.

C
4 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

Davis & Jones, LLC

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Sterling Credit Corp.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION

B
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Assured Financial LLC

D
7 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

P&L Acquisitions LLC

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Southwest Mediation Service

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

BANKERS HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC

C
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↓ falling

Sunset Solutions Group, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

BELMONT FINANCE LLC

C
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Financial Freedom Group, LLC

D
3 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Texas appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Texas residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Texas Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Texas attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Texas). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Texas-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Texas reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Texas's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.