State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Texas

154,773 CFPB complaints filed against 2,454 debt collectors active in Texas.

Complaints
154,773
Collectors
2,454
Per 100k
507

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Texas Debt Collection Laws

Texas Finance Code Chapter 392 mirrors federal FDCPA protections and applies to both debt collectors and original creditors.

State Mini-FDCPA

Contact your state attorney general for current enforcement information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Texas

Consumers in Texas have filed 154,773 CFPB debt collection complaints against 2,454 different collectors — a rate of 507.4 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Texas and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Texas is EQUIFAX, INC., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Texas-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors — Page 2

Sorted by most complaints

NRA Group, LLC

D
363 total complaints 221 last 12mo ↑ rising

TD BANK US HOLDING COMPANY

D
266 total complaints 108 last 12mo ↑ rising

Ability Recovery Services, LLC

F
529 total complaints 139 last 12mo ↑ rising

Source Receivables Management LLC

D
354 total complaints 167 last 12mo ↑ rising

Capio Partners, LLC

D
508 total complaints 211 last 12mo ↑ rising

ONLINE Information Services, Inc.

D
352 total complaints 151 last 12mo ↑ rising

The CMI Group, Inc.

D
417 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Security Credit Services, LLC

D
497 total complaints 251 last 12mo ↑ rising

BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE

D
221 total complaints 79 last 12mo ↑ rising

EOS Holdings, Inc.

D
149 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↓ falling

Phoenix Financial Services LLC

D
536 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Credit Control, LLC

F
272 total complaints 137 last 12mo ↑ rising

Eastern Account Systems of Connecticut, Inc.

D
212 total complaints 77 last 12mo ↑ rising

Aargon Agency, Inc.

F
243 total complaints 75 last 12mo ↑ rising

ALLY FINANCIAL INC.

D
290 total complaints 109 last 12mo ↑ rising

Debt Recovery Solutions, LLC

D
480 total complaints 130 last 12mo → stable

MRS BPO, LLC

D
276 total complaints 79 last 12mo ↑ rising

Medical Data Systems, Inc.

D
160 total complaints 31 last 12mo ↑ rising

CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION

D
170 total complaints 70 last 12mo ↑ rising

WAKEFIELD & ASSOCIATES, INC.

F
118 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Receivables Performance Management, LLC

D
230 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Penn Credit Corporation

D
85 total complaints 13 last 12mo ↑ rising

V and H Portfolio

D
569 total complaints 293 last 12mo ↑ rising

Credit Corp Solutions Inc.

D
306 total complaints 163 last 12mo ↑ rising

Westlake Services, LLC

D
262 total complaints 124 last 12mo ↑ rising

Central Portfolio Control Inc.

D
476 total complaints 274 last 12mo ↑ rising

Rent Recovery Solutions

F
630 total complaints 195 last 12mo ↑ rising

Self Financial Inc.

F
263 total complaints 160 last 12mo ↑ rising

Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc.

D
238 total complaints 53 last 12mo → stable

HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS INC.

D
143 total complaints 5 last 12mo ↑ rising

AmeriCollect

D
147 total complaints 13 last 12mo ↑ rising

SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC.

F
316 total complaints 180 last 12mo ↑ rising

U.S. BANCORP

D
131 total complaints 26 last 12mo ↑ rising

Velocity Portfolio Group

D
211 total complaints 53 last 12mo ↓ falling

Collection Management Holdings, LLC

F
432 total complaints 248 last 12mo ↑ rising

LJ Ross Associates

D
84 total complaints 46 last 12mo ↑ rising

Bull City Financial Solutions, Inc

D
34 total complaints 9 last 12mo ↑ rising

CMRE Financial Services, Inc.

D
340 total complaints 7 last 12mo ↑ rising

Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc.

D
225 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

IQOR US INC

D
150 total complaints 7 last 12mo → stable

OneMain Finance Corporation

F
161 total complaints 94 last 12mo ↑ rising

Dynamic Recovery Solutions, LLC

D
203 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

CURO Intermediate Holdings

D
471 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Lockhart, Morris & Montgomery Inc.

D
336 total complaints 204 last 12mo ↑ rising

Credit Systems International, Inc.

D
1,009 total complaints 387 last 12mo ↑ rising

Halsted Financial Services, LLC.

D
212 total complaints 80 last 12mo ↑ rising

RentDebt Automated Collections, LLC

D
517 total complaints 219 last 12mo ↑ rising

Nelnet, Inc.

D
260 total complaints 153 last 12mo ↑ rising

Consumer Adjustment Company Incorporated

D
339 total complaints 94 last 12mo ↓ falling

Paypal Holdings, Inc

D
102 total complaints 19 last 12mo ↑ rising

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Texas appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Texas residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Texas Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Texas attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Texas). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Texas-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Texas reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Texas's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.