State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Missouri

15,380 CFPB complaints filed against 1,161 debt collectors active in Missouri.

Complaints
15,380
Collectors
1,161
Per 100k
248

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Missouri Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws — contact the Missouri Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Missouri

Consumers in Missouri have filed 15,380 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,161 different collectors — a rate of 248.2 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Missouri and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Missouri is EQUIFAX, INC., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Missouri-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors — Page 22

Sorted by most complaints

First Credit Corporation

C
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↓ falling

Sher & Shabsin PC

B
7 total complaints 2 last 12mo → stable

Overland Bond & Investment Corporation

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Range View Management LLC

D
3 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↓ falling

Genesis Financial & Payment Systems Holdings, LLC

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Upstate Remedial Management Inc

F
2 total complaints 2 last 12mo → stable

Checkr, Inc

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

RENASANT CORPORATION

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Salander Enterprises, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Access Financial LLC

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

RSVP Lending, LLC dba RSVP Loans

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Express Cash Mart Management

B
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Afterpay US Services, LLC

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

ALCAR INC.

B
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Revenue Cycle Management

F
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Tesani Management Inc

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Integrated Mediation Solutions LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

MoneySpot USA LLC DBA Sunshine Loans

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Direct Cash LLC

B
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Coastal Capital Processing, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Ridgeway Advisory Group LLC

B
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Ascent Holding Co

B
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Gusdorf Law Firm, LLC

B
5 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

K A P S & CO (USA) LLC

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Park Hill Holdings

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Leap Credit, LLC

F
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

The Barton Law Group, LLC

F
4 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

MONEYGRAM PAYMENT SYSTEMS WORLDWIDE INC

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Master Finance Company

B
3 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

2233 Paradise Road LLC

D
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Collection Solutions Inc.

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Asset Acquisition Group, LLC

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Northbrook and Associates

F
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

RAM America, Inc

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

N&S Partners

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Duke Capital, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Crossroads Systems Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Underwood Law Firm, LLC

B
4 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Advanced Professional Group

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

International Collection Systems, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

ZOA, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

HUELSON LAW FIRM, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

One Source Technology

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Evans & Mullinix, PA

F
3 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Lend You Cash, Inc

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Durrett Motor Company, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Key Management Company of Missouri, LLC.

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Utah Loan Servicing, LLC

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

ZestFinance

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Elite Debt Brokers

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Missouri appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Missouri residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Missouri Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Missouri attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Missouri). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Missouri-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Missouri reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Missouri's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.