State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Louisiana

22,643 CFPB complaints filed against 1,120 debt collectors active in Louisiana.

Complaints
22,643
Collectors
1,120
Top collector
Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Louisiana at a glance

Louisiana consumers have filed 22,643 CFPB debt-collection complaints against 1,120 collectors.

22,643
CFPB complaints filed
1,120
collectors active here
#1
most-complained: Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

State-of-residence is the consumer's address at filing, not the collector's. A complaint is a consumer filing, not a proven violation.

Louisiana Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws, contact the Louisiana Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Louisiana

Consumers in Louisiana have filed 22,643 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,120 different collectors. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Louisiana and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself, not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Louisiana is Resurgent Capital Services L.P., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Louisiana-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA, licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds, see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors - Page 7

Sorted by most complaints

Second Round Limited Partnership, Austin, TX Branch

D
7 total complaints ↓ falling

Sezzle Inc.

F
7 total complaints ↑ rising

Stuart-Lippman and Associates, Inc

D
7 total complaints ↓ falling

Total Card, Inc.

D
7 total complaints ↓ falling

United PanAm Financial Corp.

C
7 total complaints ↑ rising

Viking Client Services

D
7 total complaints → stable

Armstrong and Associates, Inc

D
6 total complaints → stable

Asset Recovery Solutions, LLC

D
6 total complaints ↓ falling

Block, Inc.

F
6 total complaints ↑ rising

Capital Management Services, LP

D
6 total complaints ↓ falling

Collections Acquisition Company, Inc.

F
6 total complaints ↓ falling

Community Health Investment Company, LLC.

D
6 total complaints ↓ falling

Delbert Services

D
6 total complaints ↓ falling

Ditech Financial LLC

D
6 total complaints ↓ falling

Financial Recovery Services, Inc.

D
6 total complaints ↓ falling

Green Square Company LLC.

F
6 total complaints ↓ falling

Hyundai Capital America

C
6 total complaints ↑ rising

Harvard Collections, LLC

D
6 total complaints ↓ falling

Holloway Credit Solutions

D
6 total complaints ↓ falling

InDebted Corporation

F
6 total complaints ↑ rising

Kovo

F
6 total complaints ↑ rising

Leafy Financial, LLC

F
6 total complaints ↑ rising

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson LLP

D
6 total complaints ↓ falling

Louisiana Bureau of Credit Control Inc.

D
6 total complaints ↓ falling

McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc.

D
6 total complaints ↓ falling

Mercedes Benz Financial Services

D
6 total complaints ↑ rising

Midwest Fidelity Services, LLC

C
6 total complaints ↑ rising

Mountain Run Solutions, LLC

F
6 total complaints ↓ falling

National Collection Systems, Inc.

D
6 total complaints → stable

National Enterprise Systems, Inc.

D
6 total complaints ↓ falling

Nationwide Capital Services, LLC

F
6 total complaints ↑ rising

Northland Group Inc

C
6 total complaints ↓ falling

Northstar Location Services, LLC

D
6 total complaints ↓ falling

Onemain Financial Holdings, LLC.

D
6 total complaints ↓ falling

Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC

D
6 total complaints ↓ falling

Receivables Management Partners, LLC

D
6 total complaints ↓ falling

S & S Recovery, Inc.

D
6 total complaints ↑ rising

Seattle Service Bureau, Inc

D
6 total complaints → stable

ARM WNY LLC

F
5 total complaints ↓ falling

Advanced Recovery Systems, Inc.

D
5 total complaints → stable

Alliance One, Inc.

D
5 total complaints ↓ falling

Applied Data Finance, LLC

F
5 total complaints ↑ rising

Citizens Financial Group, Inc.

C
5 total complaints → stable

Community Choice Financial, Inc.

D
5 total complaints ↓ falling

Choice Recovery, Inc.

D
5 total complaints ↓ falling

Crown Asset Management, LLC, Duluth, GA Branch

D
5 total complaints → stable

D'Aquila, Contreras and Vega, A Professional Law Corporation

A
5 total complaints ↑ rising

Diaz & Associates, Inc.

C
5 total complaints ↓ falling

Elevate Recoveries, LLC

F
5 total complaints ↓ falling

Enhanced Acquisitions, LLC

D
5 total complaints ↓ falling

If a collector is contacting you in Louisiana

Federal FDCPA rights apply everywhere; some state protections go further.

  • Check the collector's national record and grade before you respond or pay. Browse rankings
  • Demand written debt validation within 30 days of first contact. Validation letter
  • File with the CFPB, your Louisiana attorney general, or the state finance regulator, the three channels run in parallel. Your rights

Per-capita rate reflects where consumers file, not collector misconduct. Not legal advice, for your situation, consult a licensed attorney.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Louisiana appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Louisiana residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against company activity (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), consumer-dispute rate (the share of company responses consumers flagged as inadequate), and complaint trend (whether recent volume is rising, stable, or falling). The composite is bucketed A through F on a curve, each grade holds roughly a fifth of the 5,283 graded collectors, so an F reflects the weakest ~20% relative to peers, not an absolute threshold. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Louisiana Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint - the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Louisiana attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Louisiana). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Louisiana-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Louisiana reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies, a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Louisiana's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector, they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.