State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Iowa

3,547 CFPB complaints filed against 669 debt collectors active in Iowa.

Complaints
3,547
Collectors
669
Per 100k
111

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Iowa Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws — contact the Iowa Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Iowa

Consumers in Iowa have filed 3,547 CFPB debt collection complaints against 669 different collectors — a rate of 110.6 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Iowa and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Iowa is ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP INC., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Iowa-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors — Page 9

Sorted by most complaints

VYSTAR CREDIT UNION

F
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

JTM Capital Management, LLC

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

High Point Asset Inc

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

PREFERRED CREDIT INC

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Freedom Mortgage Company

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Seterus, Inc.

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

United Accounts, Inc.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Constar Financial Services, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

CREDIGY USA CORP.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

CREDICO. INC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Americas Car-Mart, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Debt Co LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

SUNCOAST CREDIT UNION

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Recovery Solutions Group, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

AAA Collections

D
8 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Arcon Credit Solutions LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Larry H. Miller Group of Companies

B
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Alpine Credit, Inc

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

MST Financial Services, L.L.C.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Tormey Bewley Corporation

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

TSC Accounts Receivable Solutions

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Weinberg Mediation Group LLC

F
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

GLOBAL CLIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Credit Counsel, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

The J. G. Wentworth Company

D
2 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

Mediation Recovery Center

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

MS SERVICES LLC

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

EZCORP, INC.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Rosebud Economic Development Corporation

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Scheer, Green & Burke L.P.A.

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Berman & Rabin, P.A.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

DFC Global Corp.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

ROC Asset Solutions, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

DigniFi

D
2 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

S & S Recovery, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

CORELOGIC INC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Nationwide Debt Management Solutions, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Second Alliance, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Tulsa Adjustment Bureau

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

BANK OF THE WEST

C
6 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Pinnacle Asset Management, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Delray Capital, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Tri-State Adjustments, Inc.

C
5 total complaints 1 last 12mo → stable

Lamont, Hanley & Associates, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Uplift, Inc

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

NAM National Arbitration and Mediation

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Synter Resource Group, LLC.

D
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo → stable

Miller, Stark, Klein and Associates

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Hauge Associates, Inc.

C
43 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

ACS Education Services

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Iowa appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Iowa residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Iowa Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Iowa attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Iowa). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Iowa-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Iowa reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Iowa's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.