State complaint profile
Debt collection complaints in Alabama
18,802 CFPB complaints filed against 1,128 debt collectors active in Alabama.
- Complaints
- 18,802
- Collectors
- 1,128
- Per 100k
- 368
This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.
Alabama Debt Collection Laws
Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws — contact the Alabama Attorney General for state-specific information.
Insights: Debt Collection in Alabama
Consumers in Alabama have filed 18,802 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,128 different collectors — a rate of 368.1 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Alabama and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.
Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.
The most-complained-about collector active in Alabama is Resurgent Capital Services L.P., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Alabama-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.
Active Debt Collectors — Page 5
Sorted by most complaintsGrant & Weber
DECMC GROUP, INC.
DHOVG, LLC
FAMCOL Systems, Inc.
DHarvard Collections, LLC
DFinancial Credit Service, Inc.
DProfessional Finance Company, Inc.
DMOHELA
FSouthern Management Systems Inc.
FSynovus Bank
CMillco Management
CNorthstar Location Services, LLC
DNISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE COMPANY LLC
DFIFTH THIRD FINANCIAL CORPORATION
DRevco Management, LLC
FCapital Management Services, LP
DSynerprise Consulting Services, Inc.
DMerchants' Credit Guide Company
DAVANTE
DKBR INC DBA RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES
FDiverse Funding Associates LLC
DReliant Capital Solutions, LLC
DMERCANTILE ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, LLC
DUSCB, Inc.
DConsumer Portfolio Services, Inc.
DOptimum Outcomes, Inc.
FPossible Financial Inc
FRegional Management Corporation
DAsset Management Outsourcing, Inc.
DSECURITY FINANCE CORP
DONEMAIN FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, LLC.
DFISERV FINXACT CORE
FResidentCollect, Inc.
FRay Klein, Inc.
DCOMMUNITY CHOICE FINANCIAL, INC.
DCrown Asset Management, LLC, Duluth, GA Branch
DOptio Solutions, LLC
DStrategic Alliances, Inc.
DBlitt and Gaines, P.C.
DPerformant Financial Corporation
DCollection Bureau of the Hudson Valley, Inc.
DReal Time Group, Inc.
DSCA Collections, Inc.
DMonarch Recovery Holdings, Inc.
DRS Clark and Associates, Inc.
FLaw Office of Michael J. Scott, PC
DJanuary Technologies, Inc
FFocus Holding Company
DNationwide Recovery Systems, Ltd
DGlobal Lending Services LLC
DRead our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
About These Collectors
Every collector listed for Alabama appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Alabama residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.
What the Grade Means
Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.
Filing a Complaint as a Alabama Resident
If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Alabama attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Alabama). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.
Methodology Note
State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.
Reading This Page Alongside the National View
Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Alabama-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Alabama reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.
What the Per-Capita Rate Means
The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Alabama's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.
| Publisher | Kiznis Studio |
| Sources | the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database |