State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Oklahoma

9,045 CFPB complaints filed against 907 debt collectors active in Oklahoma.

Complaints
9,045
Collectors
907
Top collector
Encore Capital Group Inc.

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Oklahoma at a glance

Oklahoma consumers have filed 9,045 CFPB debt-collection complaints against 907 collectors.

9,045
CFPB complaints filed
907
collectors active here
#1
most-complained: Encore Capital Group Inc.

State-of-residence is the consumer's address at filing, not the collector's. A complaint is a consumer filing, not a proven violation.

Oklahoma Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws, contact the Oklahoma Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Oklahoma

Consumers in Oklahoma have filed 9,045 CFPB debt collection complaints against 907 different collectors. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Oklahoma and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself, not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Oklahoma is Encore Capital Group Inc., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Oklahoma-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA, licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds, see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors - Page 14

Sorted by most complaints

Credit Bureau Central, Inc (NV)

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Credit Bureau of Carbon County

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Credit Collection Partners, Inc.

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Credit Karma, LLC

C
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Credit Management Control, Inc.

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Credit One LLC

C
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Credit Service Company, INC

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Credit Service International Corp

C
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Credit Technologies, Inc.

A
1 total complaints ↓ falling

CreditNinja Lending, LLC

D
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Creditor's Collection Service, Inc.

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Credova Holdings Inc

C
1 total complaints → stable

DRB-40, LLC

C
1 total complaints ↑ rising

DSR Holdings Group, LLC

F
1 total complaints → stable

Data Search NY, Inc.

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Data and Contact Management Solutions, LLC

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

DataMax Corporation

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Debt Management Holdings LLC

A
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Delray Capital, LLC

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Denefits LLC

F
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc.

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

DriveTime

C
1 total complaints → stable

E*Trade Bank

B
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Empire Mediation Services LLC

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Enramex Inc

F
1 total complaints ↑ rising

EZ Finance Company

1 total complaints ↑ rising

Ezcorp, Inc.

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Eagle Recovery Associates, Inc.

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Eltman Law, P.C.

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Epn, Inc.

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Equidata, Inc.

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Erin Capital Management, LLC

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Esser, James & Associates

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

F&M Capital LLC

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

FDR Asset USA LTD

D
1 total complaints ↑ rising

FEDChex Recovery, LLC

F
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Fidelis Recovery Management, LLC

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

FINEX Group LLC

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

First Financial Services, Inc.

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

First United Bank and Trust Company

A
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Fair Capital

D
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Federal Cash Advance, LLC of Oklahoma

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Federal Pacific Credit Company, LLC

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Finance System of Richmond, Inc.

D
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Financial Filing & Reporting, Inc.

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

First Associates Loan Servicing LLC

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

First Direct Mediation

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Focus Holding Company

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Freedom Mortgage Company

C
1 total complaints → stable

If a collector is contacting you in Oklahoma

Federal FDCPA rights apply everywhere; some state protections go further.

  • Check the collector's national record and grade before you respond or pay. Browse rankings
  • Demand written debt validation within 30 days of first contact. Validation letter
  • File with the CFPB, your Oklahoma attorney general, or the state finance regulator, the three channels run in parallel. Your rights

Per-capita rate reflects where consumers file, not collector misconduct. Not legal advice, for your situation, consult a licensed attorney.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Oklahoma appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Oklahoma residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against company activity (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), consumer-dispute rate (the share of company responses consumers flagged as inadequate), and complaint trend (whether recent volume is rising, stable, or falling). The composite is bucketed A through F on a curve, each grade holds roughly a fifth of the 5,283 graded collectors, so an F reflects the weakest ~20% relative to peers, not an absolute threshold. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Oklahoma Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint - the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Oklahoma attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Oklahoma). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Oklahoma-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Oklahoma reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies, a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Oklahoma's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector, they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.