State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Oklahoma

9,045 CFPB complaints filed against 907 debt collectors active in Oklahoma.

Complaints
9,045
Collectors
907
Top collector
Encore Capital Group Inc.

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Oklahoma at a glance

Oklahoma consumers have filed 9,045 CFPB debt-collection complaints against 907 collectors.

9,045
CFPB complaints filed
907
collectors active here
#1
most-complained: Encore Capital Group Inc.

State-of-residence is the consumer's address at filing, not the collector's. A complaint is a consumer filing, not a proven violation.

Oklahoma Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws, contact the Oklahoma Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Oklahoma

Consumers in Oklahoma have filed 9,045 CFPB debt collection complaints against 907 different collectors. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Oklahoma and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself, not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Oklahoma is Encore Capital Group Inc., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Oklahoma-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA, licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds, see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors - Page 13

Sorted by most complaints

Bliksum, LLC

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Blue Bay Capital

A
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Borenstein & Associates, LLC

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Bridge IT, Inc.

D
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Brightwater Capital, LLC

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Business & Professional Collection Service Inc

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Business Revenue Systems, Inc.

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

C B Merchant Services

B
1 total complaints ↓ falling

CCM Finance LLC

F
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Certified Collectors, Inc.

B
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Cherry Technologies Inc.

F
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Choice Capital Fund

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

CIT Bank, National Association

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

City National Bank

A
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Collection Associates, Ltd.

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Collection Bureau Incorporated

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Community Choice Financial, Inc.

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Conrad Credit Corporation

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Corelogic Inc

C
1 total complaints → stable

Cornerstone Resolution Group, Inc.

B
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Credico. Inc

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Credit Bureau of Farmington, Inc

B
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Credit Bureau of Napa County, Inc.

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

CW Financial

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Calvin Dean Homolka II

B
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Capital Recovery Corporation

C
1 total complaints → stable

Capstone Credit & Collection, LLC.

D
1 total complaints → stable

Carmichael & Frost LLC

D
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Cedars Business Services, LLC

D
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Centric Asset Management Inc

B
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Check Security Associates, LLC

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Chek Cash, Inc.

A
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Choice Mtg INC.

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Clark County Collection Service

D
1 total complaints → stable

Coastal Financial Solutions, LLC

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Collection Attorneys USA LLC

D
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Collection Bureau of America Ltd.

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Collection Bureau of Fort Walton Beach, Inc

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Collection Technology Incorporated

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Collins Asset Group, LLC

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Compattia Roccia Management Group, LLC

D
1 total complaints → stable

Complete Credit Solutions, Inc.

D
1 total complaints → stable

Consumer Collection Management. Inc

F
1 total complaints → stable

Consumer Receivables Management LLC

C
1 total complaints → stable

Continental Central Credit, Inc.

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Cornerstone Holdings, Inc.

C
1 total complaints → stable

Cornerstone Home Lending Inc.

A
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Cottonwood Financial Ltd.

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Courtesy Loans of Oklahoma LLC.

F
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Credit Associates, Inc. (MO)

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

If a collector is contacting you in Oklahoma

Federal FDCPA rights apply everywhere; some state protections go further.

  • Check the collector's national record and grade before you respond or pay. Browse rankings
  • Demand written debt validation within 30 days of first contact. Validation letter
  • File with the CFPB, your Oklahoma attorney general, or the state finance regulator, the three channels run in parallel. Your rights

Per-capita rate reflects where consumers file, not collector misconduct. Not legal advice, for your situation, consult a licensed attorney.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Oklahoma appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Oklahoma residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against company activity (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), consumer-dispute rate (the share of company responses consumers flagged as inadequate), and complaint trend (whether recent volume is rising, stable, or falling). The composite is bucketed A through F on a curve, each grade holds roughly a fifth of the 5,283 graded collectors, so an F reflects the weakest ~20% relative to peers, not an absolute threshold. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Oklahoma Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint - the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Oklahoma attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Oklahoma). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Oklahoma-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Oklahoma reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies, a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Oklahoma's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector, they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.