State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Maryland

23,511 CFPB complaints filed against 1,257 debt collectors active in Maryland.

Complaints
23,511
Collectors
1,257
Per 100k
380

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Maryland Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws — contact the Maryland Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Maryland

Consumers in Maryland have filed 23,511 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,257 different collectors — a rate of 380.4 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Maryland and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Maryland is EQUIFAX, INC., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Maryland-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors — Page 25

Sorted by most complaints

DLG LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

950 Credit Inc

A
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

NERD SOLUTIONS INC

F
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Goldman & Van Beek, P.C

C
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

TAMMAC HOLDINGS CORP

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Meta Payments Inc.

A
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo → stable

First Financial of Columbia, Inc

C
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Premlo Inc.

A
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo → stable

Doctor Billa LLC

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Tapper and Fratto, LLC

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

JRCM, LLC

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

ONE WAY RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC

A
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Movement Mortgage LLC

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Gershfeld Law Group, P.C.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Sagal, Filbert, Quasney & Betten, P. A.

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

TSALTA FINANCIAL COMPANY, LLC

A
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

PinReid, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Frontline Financial, LLC

C
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo → stable

Activo Corp

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

EliteCashWire.com Inc

A
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

BAY COUNTRYCONSUMER FINANCE,INC.

A
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Law Office of Cynthia Hitt Kent, LLC

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Parker & Associates

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Maryland Mutual Mortgage, LLC

F
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

American Financial Resources, Inc.

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

SOUTHERN TRUST MORTGAGE LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Easyknock

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

MBM Collections, LLC

F
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Law Offices of Jeffrey Nadel

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

PrimeCore Group

A
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Michael Scott Cohen LLC

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Horman Nichols LLC

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

ASTORIA BANK

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Your Credit Loans, Inc.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Pasadena Receivables, Inc.

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Amos & Muffoletto, LLC

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Eagle Rentals, Inc

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

NVR INC.

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Kees to Success

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Woodward Capital LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Pinnacle Capital Funding Corporation

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Apex Mortgage LLC

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Multi-Financial Services, Inc.

F
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Venanzi Law Office

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

CHEXTOP of America Inc.

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Credit Union Mortgage Association, Inc.

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Hileman & Associates PC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

STONEGATE MORTGAGE CORPORATION

F
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

1ST PREFERENCE MORTGAGE CORP

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Richard D. London & Associates, P.C.

A
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Maryland appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Maryland residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Maryland Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Maryland attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Maryland). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Maryland-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Maryland reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Maryland's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.