State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Louisiana

22,643 CFPB complaints filed against 1,120 debt collectors active in Louisiana.

Complaints
22,643
Collectors
1,120
Top collector
Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Louisiana at a glance

Louisiana consumers have filed 22,643 CFPB debt-collection complaints against 1,120 collectors.

22,643
CFPB complaints filed
1,120
collectors active here
#1
most-complained: Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

State-of-residence is the consumer's address at filing, not the collector's. A complaint is a consumer filing, not a proven violation.

Insights: Debt Collection in Louisiana

Consumers in Louisiana have filed 22,643 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,120 different collectors. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Louisiana and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

A per-capita complaint rate is a filing rate, not a measure of misconduct or of a state's legal protections. It can be affected by population estimates, awareness of the CFPB complaint channel, the mix of creditors and collectors, and other factors that this dataset does not measure.

The collector with the most complaints from Louisiana residents in this dataset is Resurgent Capital Services L.P.. Use the record as one input when researching a company; it does not establish a legal violation or answer a state-law question.

Active Debt Collectors - Page 9

Sorted by most complaints

Express Collections, Inc.

F
4 total complaints ↑ rising

F.H. Cann & Associates, Inc.

D
4 total complaints ↑ rising

Fifth Third Financial Corporation

D
4 total complaints → stable

First National Bank of Omaha

D
4 total complaints → stable

First Portfolio Servicing Inc

F
4 total complaints ↑ rising

Federal Adjustment Bureau, Inc.

D
4 total complaints → stable

Financial Corporation of America

D
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC

D
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Frost-Arnett Company

D
4 total complaints ↓ falling

HF Holdings

D
4 total complaints ↑ rising

John C. Heath, Attorney at Law, PLLC

D
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Luckmore Finance

B
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Marauder Corporation

F
4 total complaints ↑ rising

McKenzie Paul & Associates

B
4 total complaints → stable

Med-1 Solutions, LLC

F
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Mr. Cooper Group Inc.

F
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Nationstar Mortgage LLC

D
4 total complaints ↓ falling

NCC Business Services, Inc.

D
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Oliphant United, Inc.

F
4 total complaints ↑ rising

Paradigm Assets, LLC

D
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Phillips & Cohen Associates, Ltd.

D
4 total complaints → stable

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.

C
4 total complaints → stable

Smith, Rouchon & Associates, Inc.

C
4 total complaints ↑ rising

SSRM

F
4 total complaints ↑ rising

Scheer, Green & Burke L.P.A.

D
4 total complaints ↓ falling

State Collection Service, Inc.

D
4 total complaints ↓ falling

United Check Recovery Bureau, Inc.

C
4 total complaints → stable

WLCC

C
4 total complaints → stable

Webcollex, LLC

D
4 total complaints ↓ falling

2288984 Ontario Inc.

C
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Alliant Credit Union

D
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Alpat Company Inc

B
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Absolute Recovery Services, LLC

D
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Altisource Portfolio Solutions, S.à r.l.

C
3 total complaints ↓ falling

American Collections Enterprise, Inc.

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

American First Finance, Inc.

F
3 total complaints → stable

Apelles, LLC

C
3 total complaints → stable

Aqua Finance, Inc.

F
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Automated Collection Services, Inc.

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Avant Credit Corporation

C
3 total complaints ↓ falling

BMW Financial Services NA, LLC

D
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Cashcall, Inc.

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Contract Callers Inc

D
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Credit Bureau of Napa County, Inc.

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Caliber Home Loans, Inc.

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Central Research Inc

D
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Chainlink Services LLC

C
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Collection Bureau of Fort Walton Beach, Inc

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Community Loan Servicing, LLC (formerly known as Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC)

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Constar Financial Services, LLC

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

If a collector is contacting you in Louisiana

Start with the federal complaint record, then verify any state-law question with an official source.

  • Check the collector's national record and grade before you respond or pay. Browse rankings
  • Demand written debt validation within 30 days of first contact. Validation letter
  • Use the CFPB complaint process and check official Louisiana resources for state-specific options. Your rights

Per-capita rate reflects consumer filings, not collector misconduct or a legal conclusion. This is not legal advice.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, more than 1,139,000 debt collection complaints have been logged nationwide as of July 2026. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Louisiana appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Louisiana residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against company activity (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), consumer-dispute rate (the share of company responses consumers flagged as inadequate), and complaint trend (whether recent volume is rising, stable, or falling). The composite is bucketed A through F on a curve, each grade holds roughly a fifth of the 5,283 graded collectors, so an F reflects the weakest ~20% relative to peers, not an absolute threshold. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Louisiana Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint - the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Louisiana attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Louisiana). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Louisiana-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Louisiana reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies, a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Louisiana's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector, they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.