State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Kansas

4,370 CFPB complaints filed against 709 debt collectors active in Kansas.

Complaints
4,370
Collectors
709
Per 100k
149

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Kansas Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws — contact the Kansas Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Kansas

Consumers in Kansas have filed 4,370 CFPB debt collection complaints against 709 different collectors — a rate of 148.6 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Kansas and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Kansas is ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP INC., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Kansas-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors — Page 12

Sorted by most complaints

Coastline Financial Resources, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Credit Sage LLC

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Account Recovery Specialists, Inc.

C
38 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↓ falling

BQ & Associates, P.C., L.L.O.

D
8 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

New Era Asset Management, LLC

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Solutions To Portfolios, LLC

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

BAM Financial, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Armstrong and Associates, Inc

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

CFM Group LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Meridian ARG Inc.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

H. Kent Hollins, Attorney at Law, P.A

C
20 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

NATIONWIDE ACCEPTANCE LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Emerald Canyon Capital, LLC

C
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

SACOR FINANCIAL, INC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

ONEMAIN FINANCE CORPORATION

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Global Processing Services, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Reimer, Arnovitz, Chernek &Jeffrey Co., LPA

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

PHH Mortgage Services Corporation

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Consumer Legal Group, P.C.

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Accurate Financial Partners

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Elite Financial Services, Inc.

D
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Russell W Richardson, Attorney at Law

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

DTA GROUP LLC

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Five Lakes Law Group PLLC

F
3 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

NEW CITY FUNDING CORP.

B
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Residential Credit Solutions, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Heartland Resolution Group, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

GFS, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Astra Business Services

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

ARVEST BANK GROUP, INC.

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Pendleton Capital Management

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Perpay, Inc.

D
3 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

Cadillac Accounts Receivable Management

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

United Shore Financial Services, LLC

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Cascade Collections, Inc.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

E. A. Uffman & Associates, Inc

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Regional Acquisition Group, Inc.

D
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Driveway Finance Corporation

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

The Law Office of Daniel Slane

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Mark A. Kirkorsky, PC

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

FDR Asset USA LTD

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

INTEGRAL RECOVERIES, INC.

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

KAHRS LAW OFFICES, PA

B
21 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↓ falling

Specified Credit Association, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Reliant Financial Corporation

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo → stable

NPS GROUP

F
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Local Data Recovery, LLC

F
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Patrick K Willis Company Inc

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Insight Management Partners, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Chainlink Services LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Kansas appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Kansas residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Kansas Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Kansas attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Kansas). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Kansas-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Kansas reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Kansas's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.