State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Ohio

28,209 CFPB complaints filed against 1,476 debt collectors active in Ohio.

Complaints
28,209
Collectors
1,476
Per 100k
239

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Ohio Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws — contact the Ohio Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Ohio

Consumers in Ohio have filed 28,209 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,476 different collectors — a rate of 239.3 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Ohio and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Ohio is Resurgent Capital Services L.P., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Ohio-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors — Page 3

Sorted by most complaints

Receivables Management Partners, LLC

D
59 total complaints 14 last 12mo → stable

Professional Debt Mediation, Inc.

F
8 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

I.Q. DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC.

D
14 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Ad Astra Recovery Services Inc

D
21 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

EXPERT GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC.

D
51 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Midwest Recovery Systems

F
74 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Absolute Resolutions Corp.

C
41 total complaints 21 last 12mo ↑ rising

The Bureaus, Inc.

D
31 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

United Collection Bureau, Inc.

D
73 total complaints 7 last 12mo ↑ rising

World Acceptance Corporation

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA

F
15 total complaints 9 last 12mo ↑ rising

ENOVA INTERNATIONAL, INC.

D
88 total complaints 10 last 12mo ↑ rising

Monterey Financial Services LLC

D
25 total complaints 4 last 12mo ↑ rising

TekCollect Inc.

D
39 total complaints 16 last 12mo ↑ rising

Franklin Collection Service, Inc.

D
38 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Kikoff Inc.

F
30 total complaints 20 last 12mo ↑ rising

Exeter Finance, LLC.

D
45 total complaints 17 last 12mo ↑ rising

BTH Management

D
90 total complaints 27 last 12mo ↑ rising

The Receivable Management Services LLC

D
62 total complaints 10 last 12mo ↑ rising

ACIMA CREDIT, LLC

C
30 total complaints 9 last 12mo ↑ rising

CONTRACT CALLERS INC

D
27 total complaints 5 last 12mo ↑ rising

Waypoint Resource Group, LLC

F
13 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↓ falling

First Credit Services Inc.

D
17 total complaints 5 last 12mo ↑ rising

CNG FINANCIAL CORPORATION

D
102 total complaints 4 last 12mo ↑ rising

TRUIST FINANCIAL CORPORATION

F
30 total complaints 8 last 12mo ↑ rising

Continental Services Group, Inc. d/b/a ConServe

C
22 total complaints 7 last 12mo ↑ rising

TENET HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

D
4 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION

D
17 total complaints 4 last 12mo ↑ rising

Firstsource Business Process Services, LLC

D
40 total complaints 7 last 12mo ↑ rising

Williams & Fudge, Inc

D
26 total complaints 5 last 12mo ↑ rising

Stellar Recovery, Inc.

D
23 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

The Outsource Group, Inc

F
21 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Conn's, Inc.

D
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Capital Accounts, LLC

F
33 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation

D
34 total complaints 13 last 12mo ↑ rising

Ocwen Financial Corporation

D
28 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Alorica Inc.

D
27 total complaints 2 last 12mo → stable

FirstPoint Collection Resources

D
8 total complaints 5 last 12mo ↑ rising

R & B Corporation of Virginia

D
5 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Populus Financial Group, Inc. (F/K/A Ace Cash Express)

D
57 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

ORG GC GP BUYER, LLC

D
24 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Zions Debt Holdings

F
28 total complaints 8 last 12mo ↑ rising

Trident Asset Management, L.L.C.

F
33 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

General Motors Financial Company, Inc.

D
34 total complaints 11 last 12mo ↑ rising

AR Resources, Inc.

D
3 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↓ falling

CLGF Holdco 1, LLC

F
45 total complaints 14 last 12mo ↑ rising

Pinnacle Credit Services, LLC

D
45 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Credit Protection Association, L.P.

D
20 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Colony Brands, Inc.

F
31 total complaints 4 last 12mo ↑ rising

American Coradius International LLC

D
37 total complaints 3 last 12mo → stable

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Ohio appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Ohio residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Ohio Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Ohio attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Ohio). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Ohio-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Ohio reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Ohio's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.