State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Missouri

16,438 CFPB complaints filed against 1,173 debt collectors active in Missouri.

Complaints
16,438
Collectors
1,173
Top collector
Equifax, Inc.

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Missouri at a glance

Missouri consumers have filed 16,438 CFPB debt-collection complaints against 1,173 collectors.

16,438
CFPB complaints filed
1,173
collectors active here
#1
most-complained: Equifax, Inc.

State-of-residence is the consumer's address at filing, not the collector's. A complaint is a consumer filing, not a proven violation.

Missouri Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws, contact the Missouri Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Missouri

Consumers in Missouri have filed 16,438 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,173 different collectors. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Missouri and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself, not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Missouri is Equifax, Inc., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Missouri-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA, licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds, see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors - Page 18

Sorted by most complaints

Delbert Services

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Denali Capital Holdings, LLC

D
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc.

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Diamond Funding Corporation

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Direct Capital

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

DriveTime

C
1 total complaints → stable

Duke Capital, LLC

F
1 total complaints → stable

Durrett Motor Company, Inc.

D
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Duvera Billing Services, LLC

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Earm LLC

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Eastern Asset Services LLC

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Eastpoint Recovery Group, Inc

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Eisenburg,Whitman and Associates

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Elevate Recoveries, LLC

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Elite Debt Brokers

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Emergent Business Group, Inc.

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Enhanced Acquisitions, LLC

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Enterprise Acquisitions

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Equinox Financial Management Solutions, Inc.

B
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Equitable Acceptance Corp

B
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Evans & Green LLP

A
1 total complaints ↓ falling

First Portfolio Servicing Inc

F
1 total complaints ↑ rising

FMS Inc.

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Fresno Credit Bureau

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Fairway Capital Recovery, LLC

C
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Featured Mediation, LLC

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Federal Pacific Credit Company, LLC

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Feldman & Stern, LLC

B
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Financial Asset Management, Inc.

B
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Financial Filing & Reporting, Inc.

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Finmax Smart Capital LLC

D
1 total complaints → stable

First Choice Assets LLC.

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

First Credit Corporation

C
1 total complaints ↑ rising

First Direct Mediation

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

First Service Residential, Nevada, LLC

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Fix Media

A
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Flagstar Bank, N.A.

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Forsythe Finance, LLC

A
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Foursight Holding LLC

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Frederick J. Hanna & Associates, P.C. (closed)

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Freedom Mortgage Company

C
1 total complaints → stable

Friendly Finance Corporation

B
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Future Judgement Solutions

F
1 total complaints ↑ rising

G&L Wise Financial, Inc.

A
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Global Solution BIZ LLC.

F
1 total complaints → stable

Great Lakes

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Greenstate Credit Union

C
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Galaxy Capital Acquisitions, LLC

D
1 total complaints ↓ falling

General Financial, Inc.

F
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Genesis Financial & Payment Systems Holdings, LLC

A
1 total complaints ↓ falling

If a collector is contacting you in Missouri

Federal FDCPA rights apply everywhere; some state protections go further.

  • Check the collector's national record and grade before you respond or pay. Browse rankings
  • Demand written debt validation within 30 days of first contact. Validation letter
  • File with the CFPB, your Missouri attorney general, or the state finance regulator, the three channels run in parallel. Your rights

Per-capita rate reflects where consumers file, not collector misconduct. Not legal advice, for your situation, consult a licensed attorney.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Missouri appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Missouri residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against company activity (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), consumer-dispute rate (the share of company responses consumers flagged as inadequate), and complaint trend (whether recent volume is rising, stable, or falling). The composite is bucketed A through F on a curve, each grade holds roughly a fifth of the 5,283 graded collectors, so an F reflects the weakest ~20% relative to peers, not an absolute threshold. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Missouri Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint - the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Missouri attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Missouri). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Missouri-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Missouri reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies, a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Missouri's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector, they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.