State complaint profile
Debt collection complaints in Colorado
11,327 CFPB complaints filed against 1,057 debt collectors active in Colorado.
- Complaints
- 11,327
- Collectors
- 1,057
- Top collector
- Encore Capital Group Inc.
This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.
Colorado at a glance
Colorado consumers have filed 11,327 CFPB debt-collection complaints against 1,057 collectors.
- 11,327
- CFPB complaints filed
- 1,057
- collectors active here
- #1
- most-complained: Encore Capital Group Inc.
State-of-residence is the consumer's address at filing, not the collector's. A complaint is a consumer filing, not a proven violation.
Colorado Debt Collection Laws
Colorado Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (CFDCPA) extends protections to original creditors.
Contact your state attorney general for current enforcement information.
Insights: Debt Collection in Colorado
Consumers in Colorado have filed 11,327 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,057 different collectors. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Colorado and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.
Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself, not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.
The most-complained-about collector active in Colorado is Encore Capital Group Inc., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Colorado-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA, licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds, see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.
Active Debt Collectors - Page 17
Sorted by most complaintsEquitable Acceptance Corp
BEvergreen Recovery Solutions, LLC
FFidelis Recovery Management, LLC
CFirst Citizens Bancshares, Inc.
BFirst Interstate Bancsystem, Inc.
BFresno Credit Bureau
CFairway Collections, LLC
CFairway Independent Mortgage Corporation
BFig Tech Inc.
DFilaport Acquisitions
CFinance System of Richmond, Inc.
DFinancial Asset Management, Inc.
BFinancial Corporation of America
DFinancial Recoveries, Inc.
CFirst Choice Assets LLC.
CFirst Federal Credit Control, Inc.
DFirstPoint Collection Resources
DForest Recovery Services LLC
DFranklin Credit Management Corporation
BFranklin Financial Corporation
DFull Circle Financial Services, LLC
BFundo LLC
DGFS II, LLC
FGMA Investments, LLC
FGuardian Capital Management Hawaii, LLC
CGulf Coast Collection Bureau, Inc.
DGVA Holdings, LLC
CGatestone & Co. International Inc.
DGeneral Financial, Inc.
FGenpact Limited
BGlobal Asset Management Group, Inc.
FGlobal Payments Check Services, Inc.
CGlobal Trust Management LLC
CGrant Mercantile Agency
DGravamen Asset Management Group LLC
FGreen Square Company LLC.
FGreen Trust Cash, LLC
BGreenberg, Grant & Richards Inc.
DGreenwood and Allen Financial
FGreeting Team, LLC DBA Customer Care Global
DGuild Holdings Company
BHeartland Payment Systems Inc
DHalliday, Watkins & Mann, P.C.
BHameroff Law Group, P.C.
CHarvest Credit Management VII, LLC
BHatfield Portfolio Group LLC.
DHealth Services Asset Management, LLC.
CHewitt-Capital
DHofman Law Group, A.P.C.
Holloway Credit Solutions
DIf a collector is contacting you in Colorado
Federal FDCPA rights apply everywhere; some state protections go further.
- Check the collector's national record and grade before you respond or pay. Browse rankings
- Demand written debt validation within 30 days of first contact. Validation letter
- File with the CFPB, your Colorado attorney general, or the state finance regulator, the three channels run in parallel. Your rights
Per-capita rate reflects where consumers file, not collector misconduct. Not legal advice, for your situation, consult a licensed attorney.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
About These Collectors
Every collector listed for Colorado appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Colorado residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.
What the Grade Means
Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against company activity (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), consumer-dispute rate (the share of company responses consumers flagged as inadequate), and complaint trend (whether recent volume is rising, stable, or falling). The composite is bucketed A through F on a curve, each grade holds roughly a fifth of the 5,283 graded collectors, so an F reflects the weakest ~20% relative to peers, not an absolute threshold. Click any company to see the breakdown.
Filing a Complaint as a Colorado Resident
If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint - the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Colorado attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Colorado). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.
Methodology Note
State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.
Reading This Page Alongside the National View
Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Colorado-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Colorado reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies, a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.
What the Per-Capita Rate Means
The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Colorado's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector, they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.
Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.
| Publisher | PlainCollector |
| Sources | the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database |