State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in New York

53,744 CFPB complaints filed against 1,598 debt collectors active in New York.

Complaints
53,744
Collectors
1,598
Top collector
Transunion Intermediate Holdings, Inc.

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

New York at a glance

New York consumers have filed 53,744 CFPB debt-collection complaints against 1,598 collectors.

53,744
CFPB complaints filed
1,598
collectors active here
#1
most-complained: Transunion Intermediate Holdings, Inc.

State-of-residence is the consumer's address at filing, not the collector's. A complaint is a consumer filing, not a proven violation.

Insights: Debt Collection in New York

Consumers in New York have filed 53,744 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,598 different collectors. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in New York and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

A per-capita complaint rate is a filing rate, not a measure of misconduct or of a state's legal protections. It can be affected by population estimates, awareness of the CFPB complaint channel, the mix of creditors and collectors, and other factors that this dataset does not measure.

The collector with the most complaints from New York residents in this dataset is Transunion Intermediate Holdings, Inc.. Use the record as one input when researching a company; it does not establish a legal violation or answer a state-law question.

Active Debt Collectors - Page 15

Sorted by most complaints

Sterling Bancorp

B
4 total complaints → stable

Schiller & Knapp, LLP

A
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Second Alliance, Inc.

C
4 total complaints ↑ rising

Sentry Recovery and Collections, Inc.

D
4 total complaints ↑ rising

Service Finance Holdings, LLC

B
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Skrill USA, Inc.

C
4 total complaints ↑ rising

Smith Carroad Wan & Parikh, P.C.

B
4 total complaints ↑ rising

Social Finance, Inc.

B
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Solidus Group LLC.

F
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Stein, Wiener & Roth, LLP

B
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Tebo Financial Services, Inc.

C
4 total complaints ↓ falling

The Aligned Company DBA Extra

C
4 total complaints ↑ rising

The Commercial Collection Corporation of New York, Inc.

C
4 total complaints → stable

Thomas, King & Associates

C
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Torres Credit Services, Inc.

C
4 total complaints → stable

Tower Loan of Mississippi, Inc.

D
4 total complaints → stable

TriVerity, Inc.

D
4 total complaints → stable

Triton Recovery Group

D
4 total complaints ↑ rising

United Shore Financial Services, LLC

D
4 total complaints ↑ rising

United Student Aid (USA) Funds

C
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Vericheck

F
4 total complaints ↑ rising

Voss & Klein, LLC

D
4 total complaints → stable

21st Mortgage Corp.

C
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Alchro Inc.

F
3 total complaints → stable

Absolute Collections Corp.

B
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Accelerated Servicing Group LLC

F
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Action Financial Services, LLC

C
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Advanced Call Center Technologies, LLC

B
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Ameritech Financial

F
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Ashton & Weinberg, Inc.

C
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Awar Holding Inc.

F
3 total complaints ↓ falling

BCA Financial Services, Inc.

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Benuck & Rainey, Inc.

F
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Burke Moore Law Group, LLP

C
3 total complaints ↓ falling

CAC Financial Corp

D
3 total complaints → stable

CB1, Inc.

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Community Choice Financial, Inc.

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Conrad Credit Corporation

F
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Contract Resolve Group LLC

C
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Carmichael & Frost LLC

D
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Certified Solutions, Inc

F
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Collection Information Bureau, Inc.

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Colorado Capital Investments, Inc.

F
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Consumer Asset Management (Texas)

B
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Consumer Collection Management. Inc

F
3 total complaints → stable

Consumer Financial Debt Services, LLC

F
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Convergys

C
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Credit Bureau Systems, Inc., Paducah, KY Branch

D
3 total complaints → stable

Credit Karma, LLC

C
3 total complaints ↑ rising

D.b.m.e., Inc

B
3 total complaints ↓ falling

If a collector is contacting you in New York

Start with the federal complaint record, then verify any state-law question with an official source.

  • Check the collector's national record and grade before you respond or pay. Browse rankings
  • Demand written debt validation within 30 days of first contact. Validation letter
  • Use the CFPB complaint process and check official New York resources for state-specific options. Your rights

Per-capita rate reflects consumer filings, not collector misconduct or a legal conclusion. This is not legal advice.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, more than 1,139,000 debt collection complaints have been logged nationwide as of July 2026. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for New York appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from New York residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against company activity (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), consumer-dispute rate (the share of company responses consumers flagged as inadequate), and complaint trend (whether recent volume is rising, stable, or falling). The composite is bucketed A through F on a curve, each grade holds roughly a fifth of the 5,283 graded collectors, so an F reflects the weakest ~20% relative to peers, not an absolute threshold. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a New York Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint - the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the New York attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in New York). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the New York-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in New York reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies, a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against New York's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector, they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.