State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Arkansas

7,680 CFPB complaints filed against 751 debt collectors active in Arkansas.

Complaints
7,680
Collectors
751
Per 100k
250

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Arkansas Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws — contact the Arkansas Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Arkansas

Consumers in Arkansas have filed 7,680 CFPB debt collection complaints against 751 different collectors — a rate of 250.3 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Arkansas and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Arkansas is EQUIFAX, INC., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Arkansas-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors — Page 14

Sorted by most complaints

AAA Auto Title Loans, LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Hollins & McVay, P.A.

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

The Sayer Law Group, P.C.

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Reach Financial LLC

C
2 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

Giggle Finance Inc.

F
5 total complaints 4 last 12mo ↑ rising

DOUGLAS, KNIGHT & ASSOCIATES, INC.

B
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Assured Financial LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Alliance Collection Service

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

R J Baucum Enterprises, Inc.

D
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

APPLE RECOVERY, LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Hosto & Buchan, PLLC

C
7 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Skrill USA, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Mid Continent Credit Services, Inc

C
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Hood & Stacy, P.A.

C
10 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

A & E Futures LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Kubota North America Corporation

C
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

CORNERSTONE RESOLUTION GROUP, INC.

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

John C. Bonewicz, P.C.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

LPSG

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Schukei Chevrolet Volkswagen

F
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Greater Collection Agency Bureau, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Professional Accounts Service, Inc. (Indiana)

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Credit Bureau Services, LLC

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Credit Control Company, Inc.

C
7 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Stone Higgs & Drexler

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Southern Service Systems, Inc.

B
13 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Collection Service, Inc.

B
13 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Apex Resolution Group LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Professional Recovery Services Inc.(Closed)

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Nationwide Intermediary Services llc

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

United Funding Logistics, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Kora Financial

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Debt Relief Center

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

PCS Receivables Corp.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Kaman & Cusimano, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Global Consulting Agency LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

The McHughes Law Firm, LLC

C
12 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↓ falling

MCMC Auto LTD

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Credit Bureau of Columbia, Inc.

B
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

NCD Financial, LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

CARDINAL FINANCIAL COMPANY, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Unified Global Solutions LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Western Management Consultants

C
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

CREDIT CONCEPTS, INC.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Hawthorn Recovery Services, Inc.

B
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Model Finance Company

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

CRESCO CAPITAL INC.

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo → stable

Accounts Interchange Group LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Oklahoma Student Loan Authority

C
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Delta Management Group, Inc.

B
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↓ falling

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Arkansas appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Arkansas residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Arkansas Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Arkansas attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Arkansas). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Arkansas-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Arkansas reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Arkansas's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.