State complaint profile
Debt collection complaints in Virginia
26,262 CFPB complaints filed against 1,426 debt collectors active in Virginia.
- Complaints
- 26,262
- Collectors
- 1,426
- Per 100k
- 301
This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.
Virginia Debt Collection Laws
Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws — contact the Virginia Attorney General for state-specific information.
Insights: Debt Collection in Virginia
Consumers in Virginia have filed 26,262 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,426 different collectors — a rate of 301.3 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Virginia and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.
Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.
The most-complained-about collector active in Virginia is EQUIFAX, INC., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Virginia-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.
Active Debt Collectors — Page 14
Sorted by most complaintsSelene Holdings LLC
DRevenue Enterprises, LLC
DBALANCED HEALTHCARE RECEIVABLES, LLC
DClear Debt Solutions, LLC
FTSC Accounts Receivable Solutions
FWeinberg Mediation Group LLC
FCredit Karma, LLC
CTIDEWATER FINANCE COMPANY, INC.
CRidge & Valley Realty, Inc.
DBraviant Holdings, LLC
DCredit International Corporation
CCritical Resolution Mediation LLC
FStellantis Financial Services US Corp.
DMcNeil & Meyers Asset Management Group, LLC
FGLOBAL CLIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
DMnet Financial Inc
CFlexShopper, Inc
DSmith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers LLP
FDenefits LLC
FCredit Counsel, Inc.
CThe J. G. Wentworth Company
DDebt Management Incorporated
FScott Fetzer Financial Group Inc.
CNew Century Financial Services, Inc.
CMediation Recovery Center
CJNR Adjustment Company, Inc
CCreditor's Collection Service, Inc.
CTrojan Professional Services, Inc.
CDiversified Acceptance Corporation
FMid-Atlantic Finance Co., Inc.
DRosebud Economic Development Corporation
COrion Capital Solutions LLC
DJP RECOVERY SERVICES, INC.
CBerman & Rabin, P.A.
DSunset Management, Inc
CROC Asset Solutions, LLC
FDigniFi
DConsolidated Recovery Group, LLC
DCollection Management Company
CMalen & Associates, p.c.
DFINEX Group LLC
FAmericor Funding, LLC
FCORELOGIC INC
CNationwide Debt Management Solutions, LLC
FHealthcare Receivables Group, Inc.
CSecond Alliance, Inc.
CAR Resources, Inc. (FL)
CServicing Solutions, LLC
DRauch-Milliken International, Inc.
DBANK OF THE WEST
CRead our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
About These Collectors
Every collector listed for Virginia appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Virginia residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.
What the Grade Means
Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.
Filing a Complaint as a Virginia Resident
If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Virginia attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Virginia). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.
Methodology Note
State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.
Reading This Page Alongside the National View
Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Virginia-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Virginia reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.
What the Per-Capita Rate Means
The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Virginia's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.
| Publisher | Kiznis Studio |
| Sources | the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database |