State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Ohio

30,195 CFPB complaints filed against 1,483 debt collectors active in Ohio.

Complaints
30,195
Collectors
1,483
Top collector
Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Ohio at a glance

Ohio consumers have filed 30,195 CFPB debt-collection complaints against 1,483 collectors.

30,195
CFPB complaints filed
1,483
collectors active here
#1
most-complained: Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

State-of-residence is the consumer's address at filing, not the collector's. A complaint is a consumer filing, not a proven violation.

Insights: Debt Collection in Ohio

Consumers in Ohio have filed 30,195 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,483 different collectors. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Ohio and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

A per-capita complaint rate is a filing rate, not a measure of misconduct or of a state's legal protections. It can be affected by population estimates, awareness of the CFPB complaint channel, the mix of creditors and collectors, and other factors that this dataset does not measure.

The collector with the most complaints from Ohio residents in this dataset is Resurgent Capital Services L.P.. Use the record as one input when researching a company; it does not establish a legal violation or answer a state-law question.

Active Debt Collectors - Page 13

Sorted by most complaints

Pohler and Associates, LLC

B
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Progressive Financial Services, Inc.

C
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Property Receivables, Corp

F
4 total complaints ↑ rising

Rent Recover, LLC

F
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Roycroft Management

F
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Russell W Richardson, Attorney at Law

F
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Security Finance Corp

D
4 total complaints ↑ rising

SMS Check Recovery LLC

F
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Servatus Corporation

D
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Sezzle Inc.

F
4 total complaints ↑ rising

Starmark Financial LLC

F
4 total complaints ↑ rising

Statebridge Company

C
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Superior Holdings, LLC

B
4 total complaints ↑ rising

Tenet Healthcare Corporation

D
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Thomas George Associates, Ltd.

D
4 total complaints → stable

ULRS, Inc.

D
4 total complaints → stable

USCB, Inc.

D
4 total complaints ↓ falling

United Check Recovery Bureau, Inc.

C
4 total complaints → stable

Vital Solutions, Inc.

C
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Wheels Financial Group, LLC.

C
4 total complaints → stable

Webster Account Solutions LLC

B
4 total complaints ↓ falling

Zarvad III S.a.

F
4 total complaints ↓ falling

AR Resources, Inc.

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

ARC Management Group, LLC

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

ASG Solutions LLC

C
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Audit Systems,Inc

B
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Absolute Recovery Services, LLC

D
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Accelerated Financial Solutions, LLC

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Advanced Collection Bureau, Inc.

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Allied Consulting Services LLC

C
3 total complaints ↑ rising

AmerAssist A/R Solutions, Inc.

F
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Applied Data Finance, LLC

F
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Arnold Scott Harris, P.C.

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Ascendium Education Group

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Asset Management Outsourcing, Inc.

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Asset Recovery Bureau LLC

D
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Astra Business Services

F
3 total complaints ↓ falling

BCG Equities, LLC

B
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Bass & Associates, P.C., Attorneys at Law

B
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Bastion Consumer Funding I, LLC

B
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Biehl & Biehl, Inc

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Bilateral Credit Corp, LLC

D
3 total complaints → stable

Bison Recovery Group, Inc.

B
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Blackwater Capital Group LLC.

B
3 total complaints → stable

Brock & Scott, PLLC

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

CBC Companies, Inc.

D
3 total complaints ↑ rising

CIG Financial LLC

D
3 total complaints ↑ rising

Congress Collection Corp

C
3 total complaints ↓ falling

Credico. Inc

D
3 total complaints ↓ falling

CarMax, Inc.

C
3 total complaints ↑ rising

If a collector is contacting you in Ohio

Start with the federal complaint record, then verify any state-law question with an official source.

  • Check the collector's national record and grade before you respond or pay. Browse rankings
  • Demand written debt validation within 30 days of first contact. Validation letter
  • Use the CFPB complaint process and check official Ohio resources for state-specific options. Your rights

Per-capita rate reflects consumer filings, not collector misconduct or a legal conclusion. This is not legal advice.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, more than 1,139,000 debt collection complaints have been logged nationwide as of July 2026. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Ohio appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Ohio residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against company activity (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), consumer-dispute rate (the share of company responses consumers flagged as inadequate), and complaint trend (whether recent volume is rising, stable, or falling). The composite is bucketed A through F on a curve, each grade holds roughly a fifth of the 5,283 graded collectors, so an F reflects the weakest ~20% relative to peers, not an absolute threshold. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Ohio Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint - the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Ohio attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Ohio). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Ohio-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Ohio reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies, a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Ohio's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector, they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.