State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Louisiana

22,643 CFPB complaints filed against 1,120 debt collectors active in Louisiana.

Complaints
22,643
Collectors
1,120
Top collector
Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Louisiana at a glance

Louisiana consumers have filed 22,643 CFPB debt-collection complaints against 1,120 collectors.

22,643
CFPB complaints filed
1,120
collectors active here
#1
most-complained: Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

State-of-residence is the consumer's address at filing, not the collector's. A complaint is a consumer filing, not a proven violation.

Louisiana Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws, contact the Louisiana Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Louisiana

Consumers in Louisiana have filed 22,643 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,120 different collectors. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Louisiana and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself, not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Louisiana is Resurgent Capital Services L.P., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Louisiana-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA, licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds, see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors - Page 14

Sorted by most complaints

Rent Recover, LLC

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Risecredit, LLC

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Roadrunner Account Services, LLC

D
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Rosebud Economic Development Corporation

C
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Round Up Ventures, L.P.

D
2 total complaints ↑ rising

SF Vago, LLC

C
2 total complaints ↑ rising

SG and Associates

F
2 total complaints ↑ rising

SN Servicing Corporation

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

State Farm Bank, FSB

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

SUN Loan Company Inc.

C
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Senex Services Corp.

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Sequoia Financial Services

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Seterus, Inc.

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Simon's Agency, Inc.

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Solar Mosaic LLC

F
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Sortis Financial, Inc.

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Southern Credit Adjusters, Inc.

B
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Steel River Systems, LLC

D
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Stern Recovery Services, Inc.

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Sullivan Asset Management, LLC

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Tate and Kirlin Assoc

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Titan Solutions Group LLC

C
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Todd, Bremer & Lawson, Inc.

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Total Customer Service, Inc.

B
2 total complaints ↓ falling

U.S. Collections West, Inc.

D
2 total complaints → stable

United Resource Systems, Inc

F
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Universal Account Servicing, LLC

D
2 total complaints → stable

Vanderbilt Mortgage & Finance, Inc

B
2 total complaints → stable

Valon Technologies, Inc.

A
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Van Ru Credit Corporation

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Vericheck

F
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Veros Credit, LLC

C
2 total complaints ↑ rising

Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A.

D
2 total complaints ↓ falling

Western-Shamrock Corporation

D
2 total complaints → stable

Zenco Collection, LLC

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

ZestFinance

C
2 total complaints ↓ falling

21st Mortgage Corp.

C
1 total complaints ↑ rising

4M Collections, LLC

C
1 total complaints ↑ rising

A.R.M. Solutions, Inc.

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

ABR Recovery Services LLC.

B
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Adir International LLC

C
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Alexander-Rose Assoc, Inc.

D
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Alternative Dispute Resolutions

A
1 total complaints ↓ falling

America First Federal Credit Union

D
1 total complaints ↑ rising

American Financial Management, Inc.

D
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Ameris Bancorp

C
1 total complaints ↑ rising

ARP & Associates LLC

F
1 total complaints ↑ rising

Audit Systems,Inc

B
1 total complaints ↓ falling

Axos Financial, Inc.

C
1 total complaints → stable

Accelerated Receivables Solutions

C
1 total complaints ↓ falling

If a collector is contacting you in Louisiana

Federal FDCPA rights apply everywhere; some state protections go further.

  • Check the collector's national record and grade before you respond or pay. Browse rankings
  • Demand written debt validation within 30 days of first contact. Validation letter
  • File with the CFPB, your Louisiana attorney general, or the state finance regulator, the three channels run in parallel. Your rights

Per-capita rate reflects where consumers file, not collector misconduct. Not legal advice, for your situation, consult a licensed attorney.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Louisiana appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Louisiana residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against company activity (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), consumer-dispute rate (the share of company responses consumers flagged as inadequate), and complaint trend (whether recent volume is rising, stable, or falling). The composite is bucketed A through F on a curve, each grade holds roughly a fifth of the 5,283 graded collectors, so an F reflects the weakest ~20% relative to peers, not an absolute threshold. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Louisiana Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint - the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Louisiana attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Louisiana). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Louisiana-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Louisiana reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies, a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Louisiana's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector, they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.