State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Virginia

26,262 CFPB complaints filed against 1,426 debt collectors active in Virginia.

Complaints
26,262
Collectors
1,426
Per 100k
301

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Virginia Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws — contact the Virginia Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Virginia

Consumers in Virginia have filed 26,262 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,426 different collectors — a rate of 301.3 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Virginia and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Virginia is EQUIFAX, INC., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Virginia-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors — Page 21

Sorted by most complaints

AmeriHome Mortgage Company, LLC

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Western Portfolio Assets

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Weinman Acquisition Group

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Asset Management Professionals, LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

E. A. Uffman & Associates, Inc

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Esser, James & Associates

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Franklin Credit Management Corporation

B
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Streamline Recovery Inc

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Regional Acquisition Group, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Driveway Finance Corporation

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Rosenberg & Associates Recovery Services

F
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Mitchell Rubenstein & Associates, P.C.

C
18 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Lionstone Holdings Group

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

WESTERN CONTROL SERVICES, INC.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Mark A. Kirkorsky, PC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

CHS, Inc.

D
27 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Receivable Asset Management

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Cohn, Goldberg & Deutsch,LLC

B
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Cordoza & Wexler Recovery Services

F
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Ashton & Weinberg, Inc.

C
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

MSW Capital, LLC

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Zip Co US Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Account Recovery Services, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

VANDERBILT MORTGAGE & FINANCE, INC

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Vantage Sourcing, LLC

C
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Specified Credit Association, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

FIRSTBANK PUERTO RICO

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Feldman & Stern, LLC

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Acquired Assets, Ltd.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Red Target LLC

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Caneel Capital, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

FCC Finance, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

PASCO, Inc

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Bryant, Hodge & Associates LLC

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Porania, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Sierra Holdings LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Credit Resolutions, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Miller Davis & Peoples

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Oquirrh Mountain Law Group, P.C.

D
3 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

Atlantic Collection Agency, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Pioneer Capital Solutions Inc

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Legal Prevention Services, LLC.

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

The Collection Connection

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Nationwide Arbitration Services LLC

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Rock Creek Capital, LLC

C
3 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

Payment Resolution Services

C
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

POM Recoveries, Inc.

B
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

ASG Solutions LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Protocol Recovery Service, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Niagara Restitution Service Inc

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Virginia appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Virginia residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Virginia Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Virginia attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Virginia). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Virginia-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Virginia reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Virginia's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.