State complaint profile
Debt collection complaints in Missouri
16,438 CFPB complaints filed against 1,173 debt collectors active in Missouri.
- Complaints
- 16,438
- Collectors
- 1,173
- Top collector
- Equifax, Inc.
This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.
Missouri at a glance
Missouri consumers have filed 16,438 CFPB debt-collection complaints against 1,173 collectors.
- 16,438
- CFPB complaints filed
- 1,173
- collectors active here
- #1
- most-complained: Equifax, Inc.
State-of-residence is the consumer's address at filing, not the collector's. A complaint is a consumer filing, not a proven violation.
Missouri Debt Collection Laws
Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws, contact the Missouri Attorney General for state-specific information.
Insights: Debt Collection in Missouri
Consumers in Missouri have filed 16,438 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,173 different collectors. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Missouri and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.
Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself, not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.
The most-complained-about collector active in Missouri is Equifax, Inc., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Missouri-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA, licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds, see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.
Active Debt Collectors - Page 20
Sorted by most complaintsLadera Ranch Home Loans, Inc.
FLandmark Strategy Group, LLC
CLaw Office of Charles G. McCarthy Jr. & Assoc.
CLaw Office of J.A. Cambece
DLaw Offices of Michael Lupolover
DLaw Offices of Palmer, Reifler & Associates, P.A.
CLaw Offices of Robert A. Schuerger Co., LPA
CLeading Edge Recovery Solutions, LLC
CLegal Prevention Services, LLC.
BLend You Cash, Inc
FLendingUSA
BLinebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson LLP
DLocate Services LLC
BLocation Services Holdings, LLC
DM&T Bank Corporation
CMillennium Financial Group, L.L.C.
DMitsubishi HC Capital (U.s.a.) Inc.
AMoney Source, Inc., the
BMoneygram Payment Systems Worldwide Inc
BMSCB, Inc.
DMachol & Johannes, LLC
DMakes Cents, Inc. dba Advance.Cash
BMar Joe Enterprises
CMarlette Funding, LLC
DMatthew Thomas & Associates LLC
FMcCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC
FMcburberod Financial, Inc. d/b/a SeedFi
CMediation Recovery Center
CMedical Society Business Services, Inc.
DMercedes Benz Financial Services
DMerchants Acceptance Corp
BMerchants Adjustment Service, Inc.
DMerchants Credit Bureau, Inc.
DMercury Financial Intermediate LLC
DMichael Haynes & Associates, LLC
CMichael Wayne Investment
CMid Continent Credit Services, Inc
CMidstate Collection Solutions, Inc.
DMidwest Recovery Fund, LLC
FMillco Management
CMiller, Stark, Klein and Associates
CMiraMed Revenue Group LLC
CMitsubishi Motors North America, Inc.
FMnet Financial Inc
CMoney Stash, L.L.C.
AMoneySpot USA LLC DBA Sunshine Loans
BMontgomery & Meyers P.A. Corporation
DMotolease, LLC
DMunicipal Collections of America Inc.
DN&S Partners
CIf a collector is contacting you in Missouri
Federal FDCPA rights apply everywhere; some state protections go further.
- Check the collector's national record and grade before you respond or pay. Browse rankings
- Demand written debt validation within 30 days of first contact. Validation letter
- File with the CFPB, your Missouri attorney general, or the state finance regulator, the three channels run in parallel. Your rights
Per-capita rate reflects where consumers file, not collector misconduct. Not legal advice, for your situation, consult a licensed attorney.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
About These Collectors
Every collector listed for Missouri appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Missouri residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.
What the Grade Means
Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against company activity (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), consumer-dispute rate (the share of company responses consumers flagged as inadequate), and complaint trend (whether recent volume is rising, stable, or falling). The composite is bucketed A through F on a curve, each grade holds roughly a fifth of the 5,283 graded collectors, so an F reflects the weakest ~20% relative to peers, not an absolute threshold. Click any company to see the breakdown.
Filing a Complaint as a Missouri Resident
If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint - the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Missouri attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Missouri). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.
Methodology Note
State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.
Reading This Page Alongside the National View
Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Missouri-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Missouri reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies, a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.
What the Per-Capita Rate Means
The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Missouri's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector, they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.
Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.
| Publisher | PlainCollector |
| Sources | the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database |