State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in New Jersey

28,584 CFPB complaints filed against 1,274 debt collectors active in New Jersey.

Complaints
28,584
Collectors
1,274
Per 100k
308

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

New Jersey Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws — contact the New Jersey Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in New Jersey

Consumers in New Jersey have filed 28,584 CFPB debt collection complaints against 1,274 different collectors — a rate of 307.7 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in New Jersey and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in New Jersey is Resurgent Capital Services L.P., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical New Jersey-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors — Page 22

Sorted by most complaints

Absolute Collections Corp.

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Chelseamac, LLC dba Briteside Solutions

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Niagara Capital Recovery LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Paragon Subrogation Services, Inc

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Featured Mediation, LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Erin Capital Management, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Turnbull Law Group

C
7 total complaints 4 last 12mo ↑ rising

Metacorp LLC

C
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Keystone Credit Services LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Goldstein, Cruise and Smith LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

FirstCollect, Inc.

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Secured Resolutions, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Credit Financial Services, lnc

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

POPULAR BANK

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Insight Capital LLC (NV)

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

The Levinbook Law Firm, P.C.

C
6 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Volvo Car Financial Services U.S., LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Debt Relief Center

C
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Student Loan Solutions, LLC

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Advanced Resolution Services Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Doyle & Hoefs, LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Aequitas Capital Opportunities Fund, LP

B
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Grimley Financial Corporation

C
2 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

Accord Business Funding, LLC

F
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Summit Collection Services, Inc.

C
6 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

Ragan & Ragan, P.C.

C
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

BAM Management US Holdings Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

American Elite Recovery, LLC

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Pappas Hayden Westberg & Jackson PC

C
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↓ falling

Innovis

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

National Account Services Group, LLC.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Wakpamni Lake Community Corporation

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Caddis Funding, LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

KILOWATT FINANCIAL, LLC, A SPRUCE FINANCE COMPANY

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

The Grogan Law Group, LLC

C
12 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

United Revenue Collection Service

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Triple AC Resolutions

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Friendly Finance Corporation

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Thrift Investment Corp.

B
8 total complaints 1 last 12mo → stable

Zebit, Inc.

F
2 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↓ falling

Hidden Oak Group, Inc.

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

RSB Equity Group, LLC

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

TDS Financial LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Harvest Strategy Group, Inc.

A
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Allied Recovery Solutions, Inc.

D
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Century Debt Solutions Inc.

B
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Harvest Credit Management VII, LLC

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Robinson & Associates

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

South East Collection Specialist

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Greenback Recovery Group, LLC

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for New Jersey appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from New Jersey residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a New Jersey Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the New Jersey attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in New Jersey). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the New Jersey-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in New Jersey reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against New Jersey's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.