State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Guam

52 CFPB complaints filed against 46 debt collectors active in Guam.

Complaints
52
Collectors
46
Per 100k
34

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Guam Debt Collection Laws

Federal FDCPA protections apply. Some states have additional laws — contact the Guam Attorney General for state-specific information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Guam

Consumers in Guam have filed 52 CFPB debt collection complaints against 46 different collectors — a rate of 33.8 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Guam and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Guam is Army and Air Force Exchange Service, but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Guam-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Most-complained-about collectors in Guam

By complaints filed from this state

complaints

What this shows These eight collectors draw the most complaints from Guam residents — usually national bureaus and large debt buyers operating in every state.

Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Active Debt Collectors

Sorted by most complaints

TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

EQUIFAX, INC.

D
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

CL Holdings LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

I.C. System, Inc.

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS INC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

CITIBANK, N.A.

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

ERC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Convergent Resources, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

National Credit Adjusters, LLC

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Southwest Credit Systems, L.P.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Radius Global Solutions LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Navient Solutions, LLC.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

W&A Intermediate Co., LLC

F
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Security Credit Services, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

EOS Holdings, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Aargon Agency, Inc.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Receivables Performance Management, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Paypal Holdings, Inc

D
2 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

I.Q. DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Ad Astra Recovery Services Inc

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Stellar Recovery, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

American Coradius International LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

First National Collection Bureau, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

JH Portfolio Debt Equities, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Army and Air Force Exchange Service

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Performant Financial Corporation

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

California Business Bureau, Inc.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Seattle Service Bureau, Inc

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

CREDIT BUREAU OF NAPA COUNTY, INC.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Admin Recovery, LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

MiraMed Revenue Group LLC

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Applied Business Services, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Cornerstone Holdings, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Stallings Financial Group, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

DYNAMIC RECOVERY SERVICES, INC.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

CIT BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Consumer Legal Group, P.C.

F
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Niagara Credit Solutions, Inc

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Pacific Collections

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

BANK OF HAWAII CORPORATION

B
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Personal Finance Center

A
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Guam appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Guam residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Guam Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Guam attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Guam). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Guam-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Guam reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Guam's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.