State complaint profile

Debt collection complaints in Florida

114,369 CFPB complaints filed against 2,284 debt collectors active in Florida.

Complaints
114,369
Collectors
2,284
Per 100k
506

This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

Florida Debt Collection Laws

Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act (FCCPA) provides additional protections, including a ban on harassing communications.

State Mini-FDCPA

Contact your state attorney general for current enforcement information.

Insights: Debt Collection in Florida

Consumers in Florida have filed 114,369 CFPB debt collection complaints against 2,284 different collectors — a rate of 505.8 complaints per 100,000 residents. Complaint volume reflects both the size of the collection industry operating in Florida and the willingness of residents to escalate disputes through the federal regulatory process rather than handle them privately with the collector.

Higher per-capita complaint counts in some states correlate with a combination of stronger state-level consumer-protection statutes (which often add private rights of action on top of the federal FDCPA), more active state attorneys general, and more public outreach from the CFPB itself — not necessarily worse collector behavior. The pattern can also reflect debt-buyer concentration: states where large secondary-market buyers route accounts tend to generate elevated complaint flow regardless of the underlying account's origin.

The most-complained-about collector active in Florida is EQUIFAX, INC., but national-scale buyers and servicers typically dominate complaint volume in every state. For the practical Florida-specific protections that go beyond the federal FDCPA — licensing requirements, statute-of-limitations rules, and exempt-property thresholds — see the state rights note above and our FDCPA rights guide.

Active Debt Collectors — Page 26

Sorted by most complaints

NCP Holdings, L.P.

D
4 total complaints 3 last 12mo ↑ rising

Guidiville Indian Rancheria

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Flexible Finance, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

MFP, inc.

F
27 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

American Credit Resolution, Incorporated

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Greeting Team, LLC DBA Customer Care Global

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

TRUSTMARK CORPORATION

B
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

UNITED AUTO ACCEPTANCE

F
3 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

CAB Receivables, Inc.

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Zakheim Law Group, P.A.

C
26 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Delta Outsource Group, Inc.

B
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Astra Business Services

F
8 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↓ falling

World Recovery Service, LLC

F
5 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Credit Glory LLC

D
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Capital Collection Management LLC

D
8 total complaints 4 last 12mo ↑ rising

Kashia Services

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Auto Now Financial Services, Inc., Phoenix, AZ Branch

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Pendleton Capital Management

F
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

HIGHLAND FINANCIAL SERVICES (Closed)

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Perpay, Inc.

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Snap Recovery, Inc.

D
10 total complaints 7 last 12mo ↑ rising

Alliance Group & Associates LLC

F
4 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Roach & Murtha, P.C.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

McKellar & Associates Group, Inc.

C
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Cadillac Accounts Receivable Management

C
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Law Office of J.A. Cambece

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

United Shore Financial Services, LLC

D
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

Rubin & Debski, P.A.

F
31 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↓ falling

Cascade Collections, Inc.

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe

D
4 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

PatientFi, Inc.

D
4 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

First Step Group, LLC

C
5 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Lela Mae Portfolio Management Group

F
1 total complaints 1 last 12mo ↑ rising

AmeriHome Mortgage Company, LLC

D
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Mid-Michigan Collection Bureau

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Union Adjustment Company, Inc.

C
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Georgia Student Finance Authority

F
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Sprechman & Associates, P.A.

D
29 total complaints 4 last 12mo ↑ rising

Tennessee Credit Management, Inc

D
5 total complaints 4 last 12mo ↑ rising

Accounts Receivable Inc.

B
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Receivable Solutions Specialist, Inc.

D
2 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Rossman & Co & PCB

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Weinman Acquisition Group

F
1 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Asset Management Professionals, LLC

C
4 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Esser, James & Associates

C
4 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Franklin Credit Management Corporation

B
3 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↑ rising

Streamline Recovery Inc

D
4 total complaints 0 last 12mo → stable

Regional Acquisition Group, Inc.

D
4 total complaints 0 last 12mo ↓ falling

Amscot Corporation

B
30 total complaints 2 last 12mo → stable

Driveway Finance Corporation

D
4 total complaints 2 last 12mo ↑ rising

Related

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector Editorial

About These Collectors

Every collector listed for Florida appears here because at least one consumer from this state filed a complaint with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) naming that company. The page is a per-state slice of the federal Consumer Complaint Database. Most entries are credit-reporting agencies (Equifax, TransUnion, Experian) and large national debt-buyers (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery, Resurgent Capital). Smaller regional collectors appear only when complaint volume from Florida residents passes the dataset's inclusion threshold.

What the Grade Means

Each company's letter grade combines four signals: total CFPB complaint volume normalized against fleet medians (size-adjusted), timely-response rate (the share of complaints answered within the federal 15-day window), monetary-or-non-monetary relief rate (the share of complaints resolved with corrective action versus closed with explanation only), and consumer-narrative tone (a sentiment signal extracted from the redacted public complaint text). The composite is bucketed A through F; the lowest 10% of scores fleet-wide land in F. Click any company to see the breakdown.

Filing a Complaint as a Florida Resident

If you believe a collector named on this page has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or otherwise mishandled your account, you have three parallel channels. First, the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint — the federal channel that powers this dataset. Second, the Florida attorney general's consumer protection division, which enforces state-level debt-collection statutes. Third, the state banking-and-finance regulator (which may license debt collectors operating in Florida). The three channels serve different purposes and can be pursued in parallel; we recommend the CFPB first because it produces a public record and a required company response within 15 days.

Methodology Note

State-of-residence in the CFPB record is the consumer's address at the time of complaint, not the collector's address. National collectors operate from a small number of corporate centers (typically Texas, Arizona, Florida, California) but appear on every state's per-state page when consumers from that state file. The state ranking and the per-state collector counts therefore reflect consumer experience, not corporate footprint. For collector headquarters and licensing detail, see the individual collector detail page.

Reading This Page Alongside the National View

Every collector listed here also appears on the national rankings page and on the recent-12-month leaderboard. The state-page slice gives you the Florida-specific complaint volume and per-state collector mix; the national pages give you the full nationwide context for understanding whether a collector's behavior in Florida reflects a structural pattern or a localized issue. We recommend reading both before deciding whether to file a complaint or pursue state-channel remedies — a collector with high state volume but low national volume points toward a regional portfolio acquisition or enforcement gap, while a collector with high state AND national volume points toward a structural compliance issue.

What the Per-Capita Rate Means

The complaints-per-100,000-residents rate normalizes absolute complaint volume against Florida's population, which makes cross-state comparison meaningful. Populous states naturally generate higher absolute complaint counts, but per-capita rate surfaces states where consumers are disproportionately likely to file federal complaints. A high per-capita rate typically reflects some combination of (a) higher uninsured-rate medical-debt activity, (b) weaker state-level debt-collection licensing enforcement, (c) longer statute-of-limitations periods on consumer debt, or (d) active consumer-advocacy infrastructure that directs residents toward the federal complaint channel. None of these factors implies misconduct by any specific collector — they shape the volume at which consumers in a state are willing and able to file complaints with the federal government.