This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

CFPB complaint data Grade D 645 complaints

Regional Management Corporation - Debt Collector Complaint Profile

CFPB complaint profile across 34 states, reputation grade D.

Complaints by issue type

What consumers report about Regional Management Corporation

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Data updated September 2026

CFPB complaint disposition

CCDB record regional-management-corporation Regional Management Corporation

Grade D · 645 CFPB filings · 98% timely · lead issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed · vol #217 · compose #3224

  • VOL 645
  • GRADE D
  • 12MO 191
  • STATES 34
  • TIMELY 98%
  • DISPUTE 12%
  • ISSUE Attempts to collect debt n…
  • RANK #217
  • COMPOSE #3,224

Nearest volume peer: Professional Finance Company, Inc. (646 complaints)

Hovg, LLC642Harvard Collections, LLC644Regional Management Corporat…645Professional Finance Company…646Ecmc Group, Inc.648
CFPB complaint volume neighbourhood (this collector + nearest volume peers)

Regional Management Corporation's 645 CFPB complaints sit next to Professional Finance Company, Inc. on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →

State-heavy filing map

33.0% of Regional Management Corporation's CFPB filings land in Texas

High volume does not equal a clean composite: Regional Management Corporation is volume #217 but composite #3,224, while Texas dominates the geography. Corpus placement method.

Dominant state
Texas 33.0%
213 of 645 filings · 34 states touched
Spike month
2025-06 50.0%
2 filings that month · spiky (≥15% of series)
Divergent corpus ranks
#217 volume
#3,224 composite
Cleanest-composite ladder is 3,007 places worse than volume

How does Regional Management Corporation compare to its peers?

How does Regional Management Corporation compare? Versus a similar-volume peer and the national average (collectors with ≥50 total complaints), drawn from 10 collectors with a comparable complaint count
Regional Management Co… National average
Complaints (last 12 mo)lower is better
191
67
268
Timely-response ratehigher is better
98%
98%
91%
Consumer-dispute ratelower is better
12%
19%
19%

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.

Complaint Trend (24 months)

2021-03 2025-08

Issue Detail Breakdown

Issue Complaints
Attempts to collect debt not owed 218
Communication tactics 140
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action 111
Written notification about debt 44
False statements or representation 41
Threatened to contact someone or share information improperly 36
Improper contact or sharing of info 17
Disclosure verification of debt 15
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed 12
Electronic communications 7

Where do complaints against Regional Management Corporation come from?

Regional Management Corporation's own per-state count, not a national baseline.

Top states by complaints against Regional Management Corporation

Across 34 states with at least one filing

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Compare beyond geography

Nationwide peers by volume & timely response

Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Regional Management Corporation: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.

Know your rights before responding to Regional Management Corporation: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.