This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

CFPB complaint data Grade D 144 complaints

Stuart-Lippman and Associates, Inc - Debt Collector Complaint Profile

CFPB complaint profile across 30 states, reputation grade D.

Complaints by issue type

What consumers report about Stuart-Lippman and Associates, Inc

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Data updated September 2026

CFPB complaint disposition

CCDB record stuart-lippman-and-associates-inc Stuart-Lippman and Associates, Inc

Grade D · 144 CFPB filings · 89% timely · lead issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed · vol #674 · compose #4122

  • VOL 144
  • GRADE D
  • 12MO 8
  • STATES 30
  • TIMELY 89%
  • DISPUTE 29%
  • ISSUE Attempts to collect debt n…
  • RANK #674
  • COMPOSE #4,122

Nearest volume peer: Keynote Consulting, Inc. (144 complaints)

Keynote Consulting, Inc.144Preferred Credit Inc144Stuart-Lippman and Associate…144JDJ Investments, INC.145KeyBridge Medical Revenue Ma…145
CFPB complaint volume neighbourhood (this collector + nearest volume peers)

Stuart-Lippman and Associates, Inc's 144 CFPB complaints sit next to Keynote Consulting, Inc. on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →

Distributed filing map

Stuart-Lippman and Associates, Inc spreads filings across 30 states - California leads at only 12.5%

Despite a broad state map, Stuart-Lippman and Associates, Inc still sits volume #674 against composite #4,122 - the two RankMaps diverge by 3,448 places. Corpus placement method.

Most-even geography
Lead state under 15%
California still leads at 12.5% across 30 states
Even monthly load
Peak under 8%
Highest month 2019-02 at 6.9% (2 filings)
Divergent corpus ranks
#674 volume
#4,122 composite
Cleanest-composite ladder is 3,448 places worse than volume

How does Stuart-Lippman and Associates, Inc compare to its peers?

How does Stuart-Lippman and Associates, Inc compare? Versus a similar-volume peer and the national average (collectors with ≥50 total complaints), drawn from 10 collectors with a comparable complaint count
Stuart-Lippman and Ass… National average
Complaints (last 12 mo)lower is better
8
62
268
Timely-response ratehigher is better
89%
100%
91%
Consumer-dispute ratelower is better
29%
20%
19%

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.

Complaint Trend (24 months)

2019-01 2026-01

Issue Detail Breakdown

Issue Complaints
Attempts to collect debt not owed 35
Written notification about debt 22
False statements or representation 19
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action 17
Disclosure verification of debt 16
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed 15
Communication tactics 13
Threatened to contact someone or share information improperly 6
Electronic communications 1

Where do complaints against Stuart-Lippman and Associates, Inc come from?

Stuart-Lippman and Associates, Inc's own per-state count, not a national baseline.

Top states by complaints against Stuart-Lippman and Associates, Inc

Across 30 states with at least one filing

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Compare beyond geography

Nationwide peers by volume & timely response

Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Stuart-Lippman and Associates, Inc: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.

Know your rights before responding to Stuart-Lippman and Associates, Inc: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.