This data comes from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database and reflects consumer complaints, not proven violations.

CFPB complaint data Grade D 286 complaints

Receivables Management Corporation - Debt Collector Complaint Profile

CFPB complaint profile across 18 states, reputation grade D.

Complaints by issue type

What consumers report about Receivables Management Corporation

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Data updated September 2026

CFPB complaint disposition

CCDB record receivables-management-corporation Receivables Management Corporation

Grade D · 286 CFPB filings · 94% timely · lead issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed · vol #411 · compose #3975

  • VOL 286
  • GRADE D
  • 12MO 40
  • STATES 18
  • TIMELY 94%
  • DISPUTE 24%
  • ISSUE Attempts to collect debt n…
  • RANK #411
  • COMPOSE #3,975

Nearest volume peer: Collection Information Bureau, Inc. (287 complaints)

M&T Bank Corporation285N.A.R., Inc.285Receivables Management Corpo…286Collection Information Burea…287Remex, Inc.287
CFPB complaint volume neighbourhood (this collector + nearest volume peers)

Receivables Management Corporation's 286 CFPB complaints sit next to Collection Information Bureau, Inc. on the volume neighbourhood; peer NAMES stay, and disposition VALUES are this collector's. Grades compare collectors to each other - a complaint is a filing, not a proven violation. How to read a complaint count →

State-heavy filing map

82.5% of Receivables Management Corporation's CFPB filings land in South Carolina

High volume does not equal a clean composite: Receivables Management Corporation is volume #411 but composite #3,975, while South Carolina dominates the geography. Corpus placement method.

Dominant state
South Carolina 82.5%
236 of 286 filings · 18 states touched
Spike month
2026-02 18.9%
10 filings that month · spiky (≥15% of series)
Divergent corpus ranks
#411 volume
#3,975 composite
Cleanest-composite ladder is 3,564 places worse than volume

How does Receivables Management Corporation compare to its peers?

How does Receivables Management Corporation compare? Versus a similar-volume peer and the national average (collectors with ≥50 total complaints), drawn from 10 collectors with a comparable complaint count
Receivables Management… National average
Complaints (last 12 mo)lower is better
40
24
268
Timely-response ratehigher is better
94%
99%
91%
Consumer-dispute ratelower is better
24%
20%
19%

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.

Complaint Trend (24 months)

2023-06 2026-02

Issue Detail Breakdown

Issue Complaints
Attempts to collect debt not owed 137
Written notification about debt 69
Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed 23
Took or threatened to take negative or legal action 21
False statements or representation 17
Communication tactics 10
Disclosure verification of debt 5
Threatened to contact someone or share information improperly 2
Improper contact or sharing of info 2

Where do complaints against Receivables Management Corporation come from?

Receivables Management Corporation's own per-state count, not a national baseline.

Top states by complaints against Receivables Management Corporation

Across 18 states with at least one filing

complaints
Source CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

Compare beyond geography

Nationwide peers by volume & timely response

Two PlainCollector-derived comparison paths for Receivables Management Corporation: nearest all-time CFPB complaint volume and nearest CFPB timely-response rate among collectors with at least 100 logged complaints. State breakdowns above stay geographic; these neighborhoods vary by metric.

Know your rights before responding to Receivables Management Corporation: FDCPA rights guide · debt validation letter · rights library.

Data sourced from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCollector

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Consumer Complaint Database, 1,139,236 debt collection complaints are represented in the current PlainCollector snapshot. See our methodology for how PlainCollector computes each company's reputation grade from this data.

Every figure on PlainCollector is rendered directly from federal source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.